JamBot Logo
1-100 of about 242 matches for site:iep.utm.edu explanation
https://iep.utm.edu/explanat/#H2
Theory of Explanation Contemporary Developments in the Theory of Explanation Explanation and Causal
https://iep.utm.edu/func-exp/
Causal Role Theories of Functional Explanation | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Search
https://iep.utm.edu/hempel/
of confirmation of hypotheses by evidence. His deductive-nomological model of scientific explanation put explanations on the
https://iep.utm.edu/math-app/#H1
out several different potential contributions that mathematics might make to science such as unification, explanation and confirmation
https://iep.utm.edu/davidson/
we must understand how on his view causal explanation works. One theory of causal explanation arises out of
https://iep.utm.edu/design/
of intelligent design and inferring God’s existence as the best explanation for these
https://iep.utm.edu/hard-con/
appear to the subject.  The usual methods of science involve explanation of functional
https://iep.utm.edu/compmind/
form of computational explanation in cognitive science. This kind of explanation includes at least three
https://iep.utm.edu/math-app/
out several different potential contributions that mathematics might make to science such as unification, explanation and confirmation
https://iep.utm.edu/aris-bio/
ethics or metaphysics of Aristotle. This article will begin with a brief explanation of his
https://iep.utm.edu/descmind/#H5
causes), and knowledge have no role to play in the explanation of physical
https://iep.utm.edu/leib-met/
all of its true predicates) together constitutes a complete network of explanation, then these explanations can
https://iep.utm.edu/quine-sc/#H1
naturalized epistemology ’, which consists of his attempt to provide an improved scientific explanation of how
https://iep.utm.edu/knowlang/
there are free philosophy books inside the shop. And the best explanation for how
https://iep.utm.edu/medicine/
of science, distinguish several kinds of explanations, including the covering law explanation, causal explanation, and
https://iep.utm.edu/qualia/
be identified with or reduced to anything physical, and that any attempted explanation of the
https://iep.utm.edu/noz-poli/
2010, 29-30).  Bader notes that Nozick gives what he calls a fundamental potential explanation . A fundamental
https://iep.utm.edu/carnap/
and initial conditions. According to Carnap, there is another kind of scientific explanation, probabilistic explanation, in
https://iep.utm.edu/soc-sci/
controversies in the field, such as the nature of explanation of social
https://iep.utm.edu/altr-grp/
one respect, however dissimilar in other aspects, call for a similar explanation or a similar
https://iep.utm.edu/fodor/
of a non-physical substance. Here’s Fodor in his classic book Psychological Explanation : [P]hilosophers who have
https://iep.utm.edu/lot-hypo/
physical object, such as the human brain. In short, the explanation is that the
https://iep.utm.edu/simplici/
parameters, if it invokes fewer extraneous assumptions, or if it provides a more unified explanation of the
https://iep.utm.edu/religion/
question “Why is there something rather than nothing?” For Leibniz, there must be an explanation, or “sufficient reason,” for
https://iep.utm.edu/ricoeur/
of mind and our phenomenological concepts. Similarly, in the essay “Explanation and Understanding
https://iep.utm.edu/behavior/
the would-be causal character of its central “belief-desire” pattern of explanation in particular
https://iep.utm.edu/red-ism/
Contents Three Models of Theoretical Reduction Reduction as Translation Reduction as Derivation Reduction as Explanation Reductionism: For and
https://iep.utm.edu/evidence/
tend to infer to the hypothesis that provides the best explanation of the
https://iep.utm.edu/yinyang/
context in which yinyang is seated and functions. Yinyang as qi provides an explanation of the
https://iep.utm.edu/con-meta/#SH2b
philosophy ‘leaves everything as it is’ (2001: section 124). ‘[W]e must do away with all explanation , and description
https://iep.utm.edu/emergenc/
was whether life, mind and chemical bonding could be given a physical explanation and, by
https://iep.utm.edu/universa/
to suppose that black holes are responsible. Again, this is controversial, but if the explanation provided is the
https://iep.utm.edu/mult-rea/
sets of law statements, and the covering-law model of explanation claimed that explanation was
https://iep.utm.edu/indimath/
of the new argument, PS*, would entail showing that realism is a better explanation of the
https://iep.utm.edu/anim-eth/
and that no reference to conscious episodes was required for such an explanation. Relying on the
https://iep.utm.edu/hume-ima/
the ideas and basic functions of the inclusive imagination. If this explanation succeeds, then it shows
https://iep.utm.edu/atheism/
the evolution of life on Earth make the God hypothesis an unlikely explanation.  Widespread non-belief and
https://iep.utm.edu/mathfict/
account of the value of mathematical inquiry and an explanation of why
https://iep.utm.edu/contextu/
are independently plausible yet mutually inconsistent. That (1) is plausible seems to require no explanation. (3) is plausible because
https://iep.utm.edu/history/
regard material conditions as opposed to motivational conditions, as sufficient for historical explanation. 5. 19th Century Scientific
https://iep.utm.edu/reichenb/
he find the spring is stretched. There are two different although equivalent explanations. First explanation. The body
https://iep.utm.edu/occasion/
for the “proper actions of natural things” by metaphysical reification rather than epistemological explanation. They are thus “occult
https://iep.utm.edu/mean-ana/
course, an explanation squarely focused on all this other meaning of life “stuff.”  This explanation can be thought of
https://iep.utm.edu/int-ex-ml/
access to our contents as well as problems about mental causation and psychological explanation, but externalists have offered
https://iep.utm.edu/anaximen/
and Plato  (Timaeus 49b-c) see Anaximenes’ theory as providing a common-sense explanation of change
https://iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/
be a supremely complex and improbable entity who needs an even bigger explanation than the one
https://iep.utm.edu/virtueep/
versions of foundationalism, Sosa claims, seem utterly incapable of providing such an explanation, especially when the
https://iep.utm.edu/coherent/
with their own respective canons: for example, inference to the best explanation, enumerative induction, and
https://iep.utm.edu/naturali/
determinism and free will attained high visibility. In both cases, the explanation had to do
https://iep.utm.edu/zizek/
the importance of what people “have on their consciences” in the explanation of how
https://iep.utm.edu/ep-testi/
rejecting principles related to memory, enumerative induction, inference to the best explanation, perception, and testimony
https://iep.utm.edu/freewi-m/
all of these activities. He is providing what we might call a microscopic explanation for what
https://iep.utm.edu/conc-rol/
requires that a theory of meaning provide a more illuminating explanation of what
https://iep.utm.edu/b-madhya/
the traditionally Buddhist idea of “two truths,” or two levels of explanation or description: the
https://iep.utm.edu/lawofnat/
The Case for Regularity Naturalizing Philosophy Revisiting Physical Impossibility Regularity and Explanation Problems with Necessitarianism I
https://iep.utm.edu/composit/
need to understand English sentences they have never encountered before. Conclusion : The best explanation for the
https://iep.utm.edu/embodcog/
environmental factors that are essential to the formation of an accurate explanation of cognitive
https://iep.utm.edu/mathplat/
4” are objective truths . Platonists argue—or, more frequently, simply assume—that the best explanation of this
https://iep.utm.edu/cynics/
identifies controversially as the original Cynic), and yet a third explanation uses the figure
https://iep.utm.edu/wuxing/
Since that time, the wuxing system has been applied to the explanation of natural
https://iep.utm.edu/wangbi/
in which elite interest began to shift toward Daoism. A brief explanation of this
https://iep.utm.edu/law-econ/
have proved amenable to economic analysis. However, it may be argued that an economic explanation of law
https://iep.utm.edu/apriori/#H2
to rational insight. The grounds for this claim are that an explanation can be offered of
https://iep.utm.edu/consc-hi/
their theory of consciousness (Rosenthal 1991, 2005, Lycan 1996). Thus, a full explanation of phenomenal
https://iep.utm.edu/anom-mon/
a genuinely intermediate position between the approach favored by  Verstehen theorists to explanation in the
https://iep.utm.edu/goethe/
the sensible qualities of the object, Goethe believed a sufficient explanation must address that object
https://iep.utm.edu/epis-mem/
she does not know that she has. This conjunction sounds odd and one plausible explanation of the
https://iep.utm.edu/intentio/
good predictions about their behavior. If intentional states are conformal with their objects, we have some explanation for how
https://iep.utm.edu/evidenti/
For instance, we think we have some non-occurrent beliefs that are justified. We need an explanation of this
https://iep.utm.edu/events/
events which provides a framework to develop theories of causation, explanation, and to
https://iep.utm.edu/aristotl/
Athens around the time Plato died, in 348 or 347 B.C.E. One explanation is that as a
https://iep.utm.edu/ani-mind/
detected in them” (1649/1970, p. 251). Rather, Descartes concluded, the best explanation for the
https://iep.utm.edu/schopenh/
principle of sufficient reason of becoming, which regards empirical objects, provides an explanation in terms
https://iep.utm.edu/nat-epis/
data. Instead, Kuhn believes social and political forces guide paradigm changes. Thus, an adequate explanation of scientific
https://iep.utm.edu/alex-sam/
one substance exists, which does not depend on anything else for its existence or explanation: everything that exists in
https://iep.utm.edu/cicero-a/
the possibility of knowledge (Sections 2 and 3) along with Philo’s explanation for how
https://iep.utm.edu/peircepr/
or “would-bes,” as he called them. Peirce’s use of “nominalism” requires some explanation. Nominalism is more normally
https://iep.utm.edu/kk-princ/
that the teacher cannot give them a surprise examination. The explanation is that they cannot
https://iep.utm.edu/bol-math/
the basis for a theory of mathematical demonstration and explanation whose historical interest is
https://iep.utm.edu/hume/
existence of objects, and this idea he accounts for. His explanation is lengthy, but involves
https://iep.utm.edu/mental-c/
While the phenomenon of mental causation seems obvious enough, the explanation of how
https://iep.utm.edu/freg-lan/
conceived of as part of reason or as its basis. Frege’s third explanation for why
https://iep.utm.edu/gnostic/
experience, or a rationally ordered account of such an experience, including an explanation of its
https://iep.utm.edu/hume-rel/
ought to infer the latter. This preference for a naturalistic explanation is reemphasized in
https://iep.utm.edu/evil-evi/
rape and murder of a little girl. It seems plausible that no explanation is available as to
https://iep.utm.edu/berkeley/
of its existence might be justified if it is necessary to provide an explanation of a
https://iep.utm.edu/spinoz-m/
Axiom d Definition l Lemma post. Postulate p Proposition c Corollary d demonstration s Scholium exp. Explanation For example
https://iep.utm.edu/time/
cards inevitably produces every specific ordering of the cards. Opponents complain that anthropic explanation is shallow. To
https://iep.utm.edu/neo-conf/
of “concern consciousness” when they are giving a robust and detailed explanation of the
https://iep.utm.edu/descarte/
knowledge. Second, he wanted to replace their final causal model of scientific explanation with the more
https://iep.utm.edu/neo-kant/
Helmholtz and the materialists both thought that Newtonian science was the best explanation of the
https://iep.utm.edu/div-simp/
to the principle of sufficient explanation. Everything in existence requires complete explanation for why
https://iep.utm.edu/wright/
his of natural history at Harvard College) Wright’s study “A Popular Explanation (for those
https://iep.utm.edu/theomind/
and to let ontological/metaphysical questions be answered by (i) focusing on questions about explanation and theory
https://iep.utm.edu/omnisci/
world. 3) Abductive Reasoning An abductive argument is an argument to the best explanation. Inferential knowledge of
https://iep.utm.edu/platoorg/
the organism.   That which is produced directly by intelligence may only have a teleological explanation, while that caused by
https://iep.utm.edu/cont-rat/
the outside. In this more general sense, then, to give an explanation for Leibniz
https://iep.utm.edu/thales/
This [opinion that the earth rests on water] is the most ancient explanation which has come down
https://iep.utm.edu/desc-sci/
challenge was more or less that something like this must be so because no purely material explanation, in terms
https://iep.utm.edu/smith/
notes, in combination with his essay on astronomy, offer an account of explanation that Smith himself regarded