four challenged provisions of SB 1070, finding that pre-emption did not apply. (His opinion was a concurrence

four challenged provisions of SB 1070, finding that pre-emption did not apply. (His opinion was a concurrence

filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, J., joined. Read More Opinions Opinion (Scalia) Concurrence (Souter) Dissent

might supervene. In the cases referred to in the opinion of the

The first two cut in favor of jettisoning Jackson: the opinion is only two decades

is an obstacle to achieving its statutory objectives. Where, as here, Congress has not authorized a federal

making it unlawful to manufacture, distribute, dispense, or possess any controlled substance except as authorized by the CSA

231 U.S.App.D.C. 136, 718 F.2d 1174, reversed. REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion of the

REED announced the judgment of the Court in an opinion in which

authority in that territory. The facts are stated in the opinion. Page 206 U. S

So. 2d 249, affirmed. Page 385 U. S. 40 MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the

Supreme Court Date: June 4, 2012 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/566/673/ Justia Opinion Summary: An Indiana statute

Supreme Court Date: June 4, 2012 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/566/673/ Justia Opinion Summary: An Indiana statute

Court Date: June 27, 2019 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/588/18-422/ Justia Opinion Summary: North Carolina plaintiffs

Court Date: June 27, 2019 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/588/18-422/ Justia Opinion Summary: North Carolina plaintiffs

Court Date: December 11, 2019 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/589/18-801/ Justia Opinion Summary: The Patent

Court Date: June 5, 2017 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/581/16-1023/ Justia Opinion Summary: The North

Court Date: June 27, 2019 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/588/18-422/ Justia Opinion Summary: North Carolina plaintiffs

Court Date: June 5, 2017 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/581/16-1023/ Justia Opinion Summary: The North

Court Date: June 30, 2022 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/20-1530/ Justia Opinion Summary: In 2015

Supreme Court Date: December 10, 2012 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/568/41/ Justia Opinion Summary: The Civil

Court Date: June 30, 2022 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/20-1530/ Justia Opinion Summary: In 2015

Court Date: June 30, 2022 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/21-954/ Justia Opinion Summary: In 2019

Supreme Court Date: June 6, 2011 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/563/816/ Justia Opinion Summary: Defendant pleaded guilty

Supreme Court Date: June 6, 2011 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/563/816/ Justia Opinion Summary: Defendant pleaded guilty

the United States. Page 260 U. S. 126 MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the

or other mail route, a privately owned box coming within such designation is an "authorized depository for mail

condemnation, inasmuch as the law which created the forfeiture, and authorized the condemnation

at New Orleans from J. R. Conner, alleged to be the lawfully authorized agent of Barrow

in this case may have been so narrowly circumscribed that it could constitutionally have been authorized in advance

26, 1959 Decided March 30, 1959 359 U.S. 171 Syllabus Petitioner, a motor carrier authorized by the Interstate

J., and Alito, J., joined. Read More Opinions Opinion (Barrett) Dissent (Thomas) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to

accepts a license under the state law, or a municipal ordinance authorized thereby, is not deprived

Dakota, no life sentence has been commuted in over eight years, while parole -- where authorized -- has been granted regularly

and Kennedy, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Read More Opinions Opinion (Thomas) Concurrence (Breyer) Concurrence

Court of Appeals affirmed, ruling that the regulation barred all employment, whether authorized or unauthorized, and

of Appeals authorized review beyond the permissible limits defined in this opinion. After first stating that

U. S. 185 -190. 241 F.2d 85 affirmed. MR. JUSTICE CLARK delivered the opinion of the

filed a concurring opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Read More Opinions Opinion (Kagan) Concurrence (Alito) Hear

for violating 21 U.S.C. 841, which makes it a crime, “[e]xcept as authorized[,] . . . for any

members in good standing but who had resigned during a lawful strike authorized by the members

the respective state judges. And these, as already declared, are, in my opinion, authorized to proceed

in this case may have been so narrowly circumscribed that it could constitutionally have been authorized in advance

holding that Wellons’ claims were procedurally barred. Ibid.    As our dissenting colleagues acknowledge, post , at 1 (opinion of Scalia

U. S. 72 -77. 410 F.2d 197, reversed. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the

not provable by the same evidence, and that their consolidation was not authorized by Rev.Stat. § 1024

May 19, 1975 421 U.S. 349 Syllabus The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is authorized to provide

and the proceeds, but the warrant issued by the Magistrate only authorized a search

15. 37 F. 4th 1199, vacated and remanded. Barrett, J., delivered the opinion for a

requiring real estate brokers to obtain licenses. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the

A state statute defined obscenity, proscribed distribution of obscene materials, and authorized their seizure before, and

June 24, 1988 487 U.S. 450 Syllabus Under North Dakota statutes, thinly populated school districts are authorized to "reorganize

affected by the statute, since he was not unmarried and not an authorized distributor of contraceptives

the exercise of judgment, and the formation of an opinion. He is authorized to

the passengers on board. The articles upon which the company is authorized to take

retroactively with backpay if the Comptroller General determined that the Library was authorized to do

of the Court of Appeals is best summarized by this language from its opinion: "Here appellees have undergone

the monitoring of two telephone calls pursuant to a court-authorized wiretap of the

to the Treasurer of Puerto Rico. MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the

328 U.S. 828. Affirmed, p. 331 U. S. 751 . MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the

and the laws relating to it, are stated in the opinion of the

to casualty and surety risks in Virginia, insured against by corporations authorized to do

jurisdiction, yet the mere fact that a suit is an adverse suit, authorized by the statutes

born in Mexico, that he had never been legally admitted to, or authorized to work

born in Mexico, that he had never been legally admitted to, or authorized to work

a unanimous Court. Read More Opinions Opinion (Kagan) Hear Opinion Announcement - May 13, 2013 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to

of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (INA), which then authorized the Attorney

343 U.S. 940. Affirmed, p. 344 U. S. 177 . MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the

the facts of the case and delivered the opinion of the

the facts of the case and delivered the opinion of the

parenthetical reference to the French word "refouler," 157 Full Text of Opinion Read More Opinions Opinions

uses, transfers, acquires, alters, or possesses coupons or authorization cards in any manner not authorized by [the statute

parenthetical reference to the French word "refouler," 157 Full Text of Opinion Read More Opinions Opinions

in the consideration or decision of the case. Read More Opinions Opinion (Ginsburg) Hear Opinion Announcement

Held: The Court of Appeals was mistaken in believing that Congress authorized consecutive sentences in

of error, will review such judgment although the state court, in its opinion, made no reference to

to allow involuntary medication, which Sell challenged in court. The Magistrate authorized forced administration of

Alito, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Read More Opinions Opinion (Kagan) Dissent (Barrett) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to

Labor Tax Case, post, 259 U. S. 20 . MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TAFT delivered the opinion of the

executed on behalf of a state by a public officer duly authorized, and this

United States, and therefore null and void. Inasmuch as there was no opinion of the

affected by the statute, since he was not unmarried and not an authorized distributor of contraceptives

liquor traffic within its borders. Pp. 463 U. S. 720 -725. (b) Title 18 U.S.C. § 1161 authorized, rather than preempted, state

then “unusual facts” inspire unusual decisions. Ante , at 3. In its brief per curiam opinion, the Court

the exercise of judgment, and the formation of an opinion. He is authorized to

a plan of composition upon proof that the petitioning taxing district is "authorized by law" to

enacted in 1982 as a sequel to § 16-1-20.1, authorized teachers to lead

c. 132, 21 Stat. 429, the Secretary of the Treasury was authorized to appoint

legislature when the act was passed, and which in its opinion was probably overbalanced by

18 U.S.C. § 924(a) to five years' imprisonment, the maximum term authorized for violation

S. 174 . Reversed. Page 368 U. S. 158 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN delivered the opinion of the

violation of their constitutional rights. The Florida statute then in effect authorized corporal punishment after the

sale of feed for stock, are stated in the opinion. Page 225 U. S

violation of their constitutional rights. The Florida statute then in effect authorized corporal punishment after the

The substance of the case is given in the opinion of the

unanimous Court. KENNEDY, J., filed a concurring opinion. JUSTICE BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the

343 U.S. 976. Affirmed, p. 344 U. S. 16 . MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the

filed a dissenting opinion, in which Alito, J., joined. Read More Opinions Opinion (Kennedy) Concurrence (Ginsburg) Dissent

this action, 813 Full Text of Opinion Read More Opinions Opinions & Dissents Hear Opinion Announcement - June 26, 1997

affirm, yet, as the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in its opinion did not seem to