1-100 of about 789 matches for site:www.law.cornell.edu authorized opinion
33 U.S. Code § 391 - Summary trials authorized | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Instit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/391
33 U.S. Code § 391 - Summary trials authorized | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7323
5 U.S. Code § 7323 - Political activity authorized; prohibitions | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7323
5 U.S. Code § 7323 - Political activity authorized; prohibitions | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please
14 U.S. Code § 541 - Aids to navigation authorized | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information In
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/14/541#
14 U.S. Code § 541 - Aids to navigation authorized | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help
https://www.law.cornell.edu/background/amistad/opinion.html
Gilpin's reply (for the United States) OPINION: Mr. Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the Court. This is theU.S. v. Amistad -- opinion of the Court Skip navigation LII Archival
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZC.html
352 F.3d 1222, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Stevens ] Concurrence [ Scalia ] Dissent [ OConnor ] Dissent [ Thomas ] HTML version
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZC.html
352 F.3d 1222, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Stevens ] Concurrence [ Scalia ] Dissent [ OConnor ] Dissent [ Thomas ] HTML version
NOTE: This opinion is subject to revision before publication. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/526/40
NOTE: This opinion is subject to revision before publication. | Supreme Court
John F. TINKER and Mary Beth Tinker, Minors, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT CO
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/393/503
for respondents. Mr. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Petitioner John F
John F. TINKER and Mary Beth Tinker, Minors, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT CO
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/393/503
for respondents. Mr. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Petitioner John F
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html
HTML version PDF version HTML version PDF version Justice Scalia, Opinion of the Court NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication inHELLER (No. 07-290) 478 F. 3d 370, affirmed. Syllabus Opinion [Scalia] Dissent [Stevens] Dissent [Breyer] HTML version PDF version HTML
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_5
the appeal should be allowed and is authorized by a statute or rule; and (E
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25-5442
months, just 2 fewer than the maximum Congress authorized for his underlying conviction. Mr. Burnett finished serving
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap
to the extent that in the opinion of the court of appeals
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_5.2
or detention, access to an electronic file is authorized as follows: (1) the parties and their
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_4
court must so order if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis under
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/335/469
for respondent. Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 In 1947
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-4/cla...
Vieth v. Jubelirer 541 U.S 267, 296 (2004) (plurality opinion)). See also Hunt v. Cromartie, 526 U.S. 541, 555 (1999
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-758
an opinion concurring in the judgment. TOP Opinion NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication inv. MENOCAL Affirmed and remanded. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Kagan [Kagan Opinion] [PDF] Concurrence , Thomas [Thomas Concurrence] [PDF] Concurrence , Alito [Alito Concurrencethis case, at the time the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/517/44
THOMAS, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion. SOUTER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and BREYER, JJ2d 614, and, in a plurality opinion, the Interstate Commerce Clause, Pennsylvania v. Union Gas
25 U.S. Code § 351 - Patents with restrictions for lots in villages in Washington | U.S. Code | US L
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/351
The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, whenever in his opinion it shall be conducive to the best
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6
enforce federal criminal law; or (iii) a person authorized by 18 U.S.C. §3322. (B) A person to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frbp
Venue Not Extended or Limited. Rule 9031 . Using Masters Not Authorized. Rule 9032 . Effect of an Amendment to
33 U.S. Code § 1252a - Reservoir projects, water storage; modification; storage for other than for w
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/1252a
storage for other than for water quality, opinion of Federal agency, committee resolutions of approval
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bankruptcy
the administration of bankruptcy proceedings, and authorized the U.S. Supreme Court to promulgate
42 U.S. Code § 1760 - Miscellaneous provisions | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Instit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1760
State agencies and Indian Tribal organizations administering programs authorized under this chapter or the Child Nutrition Act
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/23-719
TRUMP v. ANDERSON Supreme Court TOP Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in
33 U.S. Code § 701c–1 - Acquirement of titles for certain projects and to lands, easements, rights-o
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/701c-1
or channel rectification project for flood control, herein authorized or heretofore authorized by the Act of June 22the Secretary of the Army is authorized and directed to acquire in
OLD DOMINION LAND CO. v. UNITED STATES. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/269/55
the United States. Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This is a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_9
issue the arrest warrant to an officer authorized to execute it or the summons
7 U.S. Code § 292 - Monopolizing or restraining trade and unduly enhancing prices prohibited; remedy
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/292
of Agriculture shall be of the opinion that such association monopolizes or restrains trade in interstate
18 U.S. Code Chapter 216 - SPECIAL GRAND JURY | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institu
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-II/chapter-216
and practices relating to special grand juries authorized under chapter 216 of this title, dangerous special
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-1410.ZS.html
501 F. 3d 1327, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Scalia] Concurrence [Souter] HTML version PDF version HTML version PDF
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25-29
humiliate and embarrass her.’ ” Id ., at 384 (majority opinion). Villarreal was detained at the local jail before
Military Proceedings and Procedural Due Process | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/military-pr...
that, in reliance upon the dissenting opinion in Yamashita , had held that the Due
8 CFR § 212.5 - Parole of aliens into the United States. | Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/212.5
of the purpose for which parole was authorized or when in the opinion of one of the officialsof the time for which parole was authorized, and in the latter case the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZO.html
HTML version PDF version HTML version PDF version Justice Kennedy, Opinion of the Court NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in476 F. 3d 981, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Kennedy] Concurrence [Souter] Dissent [Roberts] Dissent [Scalia] HTML version PDF
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/436/547
fundamental error of Mr. Justice STEWART's dissenting opinion. As I understand that opinion, it would read into the Fourth Amendment , as549 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 The terms
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-724
4th 294, affirmed and remanded. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Sotomayor [Sotomayor Opinion] [PDF] Concurrence , Thomas [Thomas Concurrence] [PDF] NOTE: Where it isthis case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_14
Fed.Rules Serv. 14a.62, Case 3. See also concurring opinion of Circuit Judge Minton in People
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-1257.ZS.html
and Breyer, JJ. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion. Stevens, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring inreversed in part, and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Scalia ] Concurrence [ Thomas ] Concurrence [ Stevens ] Concurrence [ Breyer ] HTML version PDF
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/petty-offen...
where imprisonment for more than six months is authorized.” 2 Footnote 399 U.S. 66, 69 (1970) (plurality opinion). A plurality of only three JusticesLouisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 159–60 (1968) ( “[T]he penalty authorized for a particular crime is of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/684
The President of the United States is authorized to designate such areas in the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1337.ZS.html
OF CHIPPEWAINDIANS (97-1337) 124 F.3d 904, affirmed. Syllabus Opinion [ OConnor ] Dissent [ Rehnquist ] Dissent [ Thomas ] HTML version PDF version
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
States in violation of law. (iii) Waiver authorized The Attorney General may, in his
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/485/681
United States v. Ebens, 800 F.2d 1422 (CA6), which authorized courts to admit such evidence if the
25 U.S. Code § 343 - Correction of errors in allotments and patents | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Leg
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/343
land inserted in any patent, said Secretary is authorized and directed, during the time that
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/701g
The Secretary of the Army is authorized to allot not to exceed $7
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-1287
25–250, 149 F. 4th 1312, affirmed. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Roberts [Roberts Opinion] [PDF] Concurrence , Gorsuch [Gorsuch Concurrence] [PDF] Concurrence , Barrett [Barrett Concurrencethis case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25A914
that in Skokie , we have jurisdiction. We are likewise authorized to grant a stay because it
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-1674.ZO.html
part and reversed in part. Syllabus Opinion [ Stevens ] Opinion [ Rehnquist ] Opinion [ Breyer ] Dissent [ Rehnquist ] Dissent [ Stevens ] Other [ Opinion of Scalia ] Other [ Opinion of Thomas ] Other [ Opinion of Kennedy ] HTML version PDF version HTML versionPDF version HTML version PDF version HTML version PDF version Opinion
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lawyer
LII Wex lawyer lawyer Primary tabs An individual who is authorized to practice law. A lawyer is
UNITED STATES v. DICKINSON. SAME v. WITHROW. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Inst
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/331/745
for respondents. Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 These are two
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure | US Law | LII / Legal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frbp
Venue Not Extended or Limited. Rule 9031 . Using Masters Not Authorized. Rule 9032 . Effect of an Amendment to
NORFOLK & SUBURBAN TURNPIKE COMPANY, Plff. in Err., v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. | Supreme Court | U
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/225/264
in error. Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court: 1 On April 24
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZS.html
476 F. 3d 981, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Kennedy] Concurrence [Souter] Dissent [Roberts] Dissent [Scalia] HTML version PDF
16 U.S. Code § 675 - Norbeck Wildlife Preserve; establishment | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/675
of South Dakota, as should, in the opinion of the President of the
UNITED STATES v. CURTISS-WRIGHT EXPORT CORPORATION et al. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/299/304
revoke embargoes. He was 'authorized' 'whenever, in his opinion, the public safety shall so require,' toet al. 6 Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court. 7 On January 27
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-1056
Jackson , JJ., joined. Alito , J., filed a dissenting opinion. TOP Opinion NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication inUNITED STATES Reversed and remanded. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Gorsuch [Gorsuch Opinion] [PDF] Dissent , Alito [Alito Dissent] [PDF] NOTE: Where it isthis case, at the time the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/113/568
that longevity pay to retired officers was not authorized by section 1593 of the Revised Statutes
16 U.S. Code § 683 - Areas set aside for protection of game and fish; unlawfully taking game or fish
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/683
The President of the United States is authorized to designate such areas on any lands which
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bankruptcy
the administration of bankruptcy proceedings, and authorized the U.S. Supreme Court to promulgate
Daniel BURCH et al., Petitioners, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Info
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/441/130
See also id. , at 246, 98 S.Ct., at 1042 (opinion of Brennan, J., joining opinion of Blackmun, J., insofar as it holds thatfor respondent. Mr. Justice REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 The Louisiana
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23
attorney's fees and nontaxable costs that are authorized by law or by the parties’ agreement. The
15 U.S. Code § 144 - China trade corporations | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institu
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/144
and which shall not, in the opinion of the Secretary, be likely in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZS.html
208 F.3d 815, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Breyer ] Dissent [ Scalia ] Dissent [ Kennedy ] HTML version PDF version HTML
STATE OF MISSOURI et rel. GAINES v. CANADA et al. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/305/337
intentionally omitted] Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the court. 1 Petitioner Lloyd Gaines
Sandra LOCKETT, Petitioner, v. State of OHIO. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Ins
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/438/586
remanded. THE CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZS.html
208 F.3d 815, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Breyer ] Dissent [ Scalia ] Dissent [ Kennedy ] HTML version PDF version HTML
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZD1.html
352 F.3d 1222, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Stevens ] Concurrence [ Scalia ] Dissent [ OConnor ] Dissent [ Thomas ] HTML version
CANTWELL et al. v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institut
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/310/296
judgment, and the formation of an opinion. He is authorized to withhold his approval if he determines that299 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice ROBERTS, delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Newton Cantwell and
7 U.S. Code § 499f - Complaints, written notifications, and investigations | U.S. Code | US Law | LI
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/499f
the facts, whereupon, if, in the opinion of the Secretary, the facts
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/80/166
which one Curtis Reed and his associates were authorized to construct a dam across Fox
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/cla...
the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal
Warren McCLESKEY, Petitioner v. Ralph KEMP, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Ce
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/481/279
Cir.1985), affirmed. 9 POWELL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which
16 U.S. Code § 1536 - Interagency cooperation | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institu
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/1536
assistance of the Secretary, insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by such agency (hereinafter in
16 U.S. Code § 833a - Administration of project | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Insti
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/833a
monopolization thereof by limited groups, the Bureau is authorized and directed to provide, construct, operate
Inherent Power to Issue Judgments | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-1/inh...
of judicial power. In that year, Congress authorized Revolutionary War veterans to file pension claims in
UNITED STATES v. CURTISS-WRIGHT EXPORT CORPORATION et al. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/299/304
revoke embargoes. He was 'authorized' 'whenever, in his opinion, the public safety shall so require,' toet al. 6 Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court. 7 On January 27
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/sentencing-...
The “standard range,” therefore, constituted the maximum sentence authorized “ without any additional findings” ; the fact that a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/266/71
for State Treasurer. Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Plaintiff, Air-Way
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure | Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure | US Law | LII / Legal I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap
to the extent that in the opinion of the court of appeals
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/unanimity-o...
the two states—Oregon and Louisiana—that authorized non unanimous verdicts in criminal trials (the
Ben W. FORTSON, Jr., Secretary of State of the State of Georgia, Appellant, v. James W. DORSEY et al
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/379/433
for appellees. Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Georgia's 1962
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/487/450
Syllabus Under North Dakota statutes, thinly populated school districts are authorized to "reorganize" themselves into larger districts so that
Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Informat
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-1/mar...
80 . The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John Marshall, agreed with Marbury that Section
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23
attorney's fees and nontaxable costs that are authorized by law or by the parties’ agreement. The
Origin of Intelligible Principle Standard | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Infor
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-1/ori...
principle to which the person or body authorized [ ] is directed to conform, such legislative action is
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1224.ZO.html
HTML version PDF version HTML version PDF version Justice Breyer , Opinion of the Court NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in551 F. 3d 274, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Breyer] Concurrence [Kennedy] Concurrence [Alito] Dissent [Thomas] HTML version PDFis remanded for further proceedings consistent with this
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11
for which a different or additional punishment is authorized by reason of the defendant's previous
MOORE, Insurance Commissioner, v. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. et al. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Leg
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/272/317
for appellees. Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Three companies licensed
8 U.S. Code § 1522 - Authorization for programs for domestic resettlement of and assistance to refug
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1522
the services . Payments may be made for activities authorized under this subchapter in advance or by way
8 U.S. Code § 1522 - Authorization for programs for domestic resettlement of and assistance to refug
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1522
the services . Payments may be made for activities authorized under this subchapter in advance or by way
Overview of Establishment of Article III Courts | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-1/ove...
ordain and establish,” 2 Footnote Id. and authorized Congress, in its discretion, to “constitute
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. The WASHINGTON P
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/713
to make such a law. 5 See concurring opinion of Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, post, at 721—722
LOCOMOBILE CO. OF AMERICA v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/246/146
of Massachusetts. Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 An excise tax
The President's Powers and Youngstown Framework | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-1/cla...
of Presidential Power (1977) . In a concurring opinion, Justice Robert Jackson set forth a framework that
TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. E. J. McLEAN & COMPANY, Appt. v. DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPAN
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/203/38
46 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court: 1 This is an
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-351
4th 799, vacated and remanded. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Thomas [Thomas Opinion] [PDF] Dissent , Sotomayor [Sotomayor Dissent] [PDF] NOTE: Where it isthis case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/535/137
he had never been legally admitted to, or authorized to work in, this country, and