1-100 of about 440 matches for site:www.law.cornell.edu explicitly
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/163/537
PLESSY v. FERGUSON. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us improve our site! × No thank
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/163/537
PLESSY v. FERGUSON. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us improve our site! × No thank
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commerce_clause
is a source of controversy, as the Constitution does not explicitly define the word
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fifth_amendment
the federal government, the identical text in the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly applies this due process
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/due_process
so through criminal law, for which the Bill of Rights explicitly stated quite a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/repeal
Repeal can be explicit or implicit. For example, the Twenty-First Amendment explicitly repealed the Eighteenth
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107
the purpose and character of the use”—to state explicitly that this factor includes
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/stare_decisis
in deciding Brown v. Board of Education , the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly renounced Plessy v. Ferguson
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/griswold_v_connecticut_(1965)
a right to privacy existed within the Constitution , which does not explicitly exist in the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/employment_discrimination
each person receives equal protection of the laws. The Fourteenth Amendment explicitly prohibits states from violating
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/08-876
the honest services provision as a fourth type of scheme, Congress explicitly enacted it within the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Preemption
the local municipalities can legislate only in areas where the state has explicitly allowed the local
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1521.ZO.html
Quilici v. Morton Grove , 695 F. 2d 261 (CA7 1982)), and that Heller had explicitly refrained from “opin[ing
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/vagueness_doctrine
doctrine The vagueness doctrine is a Constitutional requirement that criminal laws must explicitly state and define
I am tired of receiving spam emails. How do I file a CAN-SPAM suit? | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/inbox/can-spam_and_consumer_lawsuits
violations of state anti-spam statutes.However, many state statutes that deal with spam are explicitly preempted by the
Rule 53. Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited | Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure |
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_53
reference to “broadcasting” is appropriate. Also, although the revised rule does not explicitly recognize exceptions within the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/authority
of agency, authority may either be actual or implied/apparent/constructive. Actual authority is expressly or explicitly delegated by a
29 CFR § 1604.11 - Sexual harassment. | Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) | US Law | LI
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1604.11
sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when (1) submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/substantive_due_process
tradition, viewed in light of evolving social norms. These rights are not explicitly listed in the
I am tired of receiving spam emails. How do I file a CAN-SPAM suit? | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/inbox/can-spam_and_consumer_lawsuits
violations of state anti-spam statutes.However, many state statutes that deal with spam are explicitly preempted by the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/vagueness_doctrine
doctrine The vagueness doctrine is a Constitutional requirement that criminal laws must explicitly state and define
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/clayton_antitrust_act
damages and an injunction . Notably, unlike the Sherman Act, labor unions are explicitly excluded from needing to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/authority
of agency, authority may be actual, implied, apparent, or constructive. Actual authority is expressly or explicitly delegated by a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/duty_of_care
and officers insurance (D&O insurance), and waivers of liability . Indemnification is explicitly allowed by some corporate
Rule 53. Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited | Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure |
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_53
reference to “broadcasting” is appropriate. Also, although the revised rule does not explicitly recognize exceptions within the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/251
or policy of the Commission, until such restrictions and obligations are explicitly superseded by regulations prescribed
21 U.S. Code § 823 - Registration requirements | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Instit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/823
research protocol described in item (aa) if the Attorney General does not explicitly object during the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/employment_discrimination
each person receives equal protection of the laws. The Fourteenth Amendment explicitly prohibits states from violating
Ratification of Thirteenth Amendment | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Informatio
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-13/ratificati...
the right to equal treatment in public places—a right explicitly recognized to be
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/laws-that-d...
101–03 (1945) (plurality opinion). The Court has upheld some statutes that did not explicitly include such a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-8508.ZS.html
361: A search does not occureven when its object is a house explicitly protected by the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/substantive_due_process
tradition, viewed in light of evolving social norms. These rights are not explicitly listed in the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/information
complaint that the prosecuting attorney (or sometimes some other law officer) usually files. It explicitly states that supposed crimes
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/agency
principal can be bound by an agent’s act made with apparent authority even if they explicitly stated that the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tenancy_in_common
and B as tenants in common." Further, if a conveyance does not explicitly show an intent to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/judicial_review
create the law. While this consideration is often implicit, many judges and justices explicitly rely on it to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/rescind
the parties’ agreement to rescind their 1938 Agreement where a new contract explicitly stated that it “will
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/express
the parties to a contract. Express contract is direct and explicitly stated and nothing
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Law
countries, such as Japan , employ a civil law system, which relies on codes that explicitly specify the rules
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2A/2A-217
lease contract refers may be made at any time and in any manner explicitly agreed to by
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/constitution
etc.). In many cases, "constitution" refers to a single written document that explicitly creates government institutions, defines
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Constitution
etc.). In many cases, "constitution" refers to a single written document that explicitly creates government institutions, defines
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/covenant_not_to_compete
not only void the “unreasonable” noncompete clause, but all noncompete clauses other than those explicitly allowed in the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/sexual_harassment
a sexual nature constitutes sexual harassment when: Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/duty_of_care
and officers insurance (D&O insurance), and waivers of liability . Indemnification is explicitly allowed by some corporate
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/civil_liberties
its citizens . As such, the First Amendment's language (" congress shall make no law") explicitly prohibits the government
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/open_mines_doctrine
cannot open any new mines on the land. The doctrine is not explicitly restricted to mining
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/precedent
only for issues, given the particular facts, that the court explicitly considered in reaching
Review of Evidentiary Record | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information Instit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-7/review-of-e...
372, 389 (1943) . The Galloway Court wrote: “the practice has been approved explicitly in the
Equal Sovereignty Doctrine | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institut
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-10/equal-sove...
constitutional provision, is unclear from the Court’s cases. Although the Constitution explicitly mandates equal treatment of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/2703
other games similar to bingo, and (ii) card games that— (I) are explicitly authorized by the
Rule 8. Stay or Injunction Pending Appeal | Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure | US Law | LII / Le
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_8
the district court during the pendency of an appeal is not explicitly conferred by statute, it
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/criminal_law
acquitted . Ex Post Facto An ex post facto law retroactively punishes actions. The Constitution explicitly forbids this practices in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Privacy
found a right to privacy, derived from penumbras of other explicitly stated constitutional protections. The
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/habeas_corpus
the writ. In the first Judiciary Act of 1789 , Congress explicitly authorized the federal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commerce_clause
the regulatory authority of the States. The Constitution does not explicitly define the word
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/248a
1) All Federal Reserve bank services covered by the fee schedule shall be priced explicitly. (2) All Federal Reserve
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-8508.ZS.html
361: A search does not occureven when its object is a house explicitly protected by the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1092
policies and sanctions related to copyright infringement, including— (i) an annual disclosure that explicitly informs students that unauthorized
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/467/837
contrary to law. Although recognizing that the amended Clean Air Act does not explicitly define what Congress envisioned
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/16-424
the constitutionality of the statute underlying his conviction unless that right is explicitly preserved in the
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/499/187
jobs, respondent's policy creates a facial classification based on gender and explicitly discriminates against women on
Historical Background on Taxing Power | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Informati
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-8/cla...
all land within each State,’ Articles of Confederation art. VIII (1781) , but did not explicitly authorize the Continental
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-13/overview-o...
Seats in the House of Representatives. Subsequently, the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly repealed the Three
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/when-the-ri...
the Due Process Clause and not from one of the explicitly defined procedural safeguards of
Right to a Public Trial Doctrine | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information In
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/right-to-a-...
the Due Process Clause and not from one of the explicitly defined procedural safeguards of
11 U.S. Code § 552 - Postpetition effect of security interest | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/11/552
security interest in proceeds, product, offspring, rents, or profits, the section is explicitly subject to other
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/elections
however, mandates that the people directly elect the senators, and explicitly bars state legislatures from
19 U.S. Code § 2504 - Relationship of trade agreements to United States law | U.S. Code | US Law | L
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/19/2504
any private right of action or remedy for which provision is not explicitly made under this Act
Rule 54. Judgment; Costs | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | US Law | LII / Legal Information Insti
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_54
ch. 110, §50(2) (Smith-Hurd 1956). The amendment accomplishes this purpose by referring explicitly to parties
12 U.S. Code § 1831d - State-chartered insured depository institutions and insured branches of forei
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/1831d
have voted in favor of any provision, constitutional or otherwise, which states explicitly and by
Historical Background on Ex Post Facto Laws | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-9/cla...
of their effect and permit individuals to rely on their meaning until explicitly changed” and “restricts
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/general-pri...
no sect.” ). But a law may “respect” an establishment even if it does not explicitly establish a religion
Evacuation of the West Coast Japanese | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Informati
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/cla...
forcible relocation of U.S. citizens to concentration camps, solely and explicitly on the basis
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Privacy
found a right to privacy, derived from penumbras of other explicitly stated constitutional protections. The
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/privacy
found a right to privacy, derived from penumbras of other explicitly stated constitutional protections. The
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/international_law
the consent of participating nations because no governing body exists to explicitly enforce international agreements. The
Rule 1015. Consolidation or Joint Administration of Cases Pending in Same Court | Federal Rules of B
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frbp/rule_1015
a) to include cases regarding the same debtor, the rule explicitly recognizes that the
Rule 407. Subsequent Remedial Measures | Federal Rules of Evidence | US Law | LII / Legal Informatio
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_407
previously provided that evidence was not excluded if offered for a purpose not explicitly prohibited by the
11 U.S. Code § 552 - Postpetition effect of security interest | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/11/552
security interest in proceeds, product, offspring, rents, or profits, the section is explicitly subject to other
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fifth_amendment
the federal government, the identical text in the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly applies this due process
17 U.S. Code § 107 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal In
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107
the purpose and character of the use”—to state explicitly that this factor includes
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1158
factor. There is no presumption of credibility, however, if no adverse credibility determination is explicitly made, the applicant
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1301
2352(a) of Pub. L. 97–35 effective Oct. 1, 1981 , except as otherwise explicitly provided, see section 2354
42 U.S. Code § 670 - Congressional declaration of purpose; authorization of appropriations | U.S. Co
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/670
of 1997 Amendment note set out under section 1305 of this title ] establishes explicitly for the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZS.html
2241(e)(2) cannot be understood without referring back to §2241(e)(1), which explicitly mentions the “writ
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/467/837#
contrary to law. Although recognizing that the amended Clean Air Act does not explicitly define what Congress envisioned
CAPITAL CITIES CABLE, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Richard A. CRISP, Director, Oklahoma Alcoholic B
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/467/691
and has interfered with a regulatory area that the FCC has explicitly pre-empted. Pp. 700
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/517/25
to impair significantly, the exercise of a power that Congress explicitly granted. To say
Prosecutorial and Grand Jury Access to Presidential Information | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US L
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-3/pro...
derogation of the search for truth.” ). Second, the Court explicitly reaffirmed its role as
Bank Markazi v. Peterson et al. | Supreme Court Bulletin | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institut
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/14-770
Bank Markazi’s assets to satisfy their unpaid judgments. The law was explicitly limited to Peterson
Historical Background on Direct Taxes | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Informati
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-9/cla...
all land within each State,’ Articles of Confederation art. VIII (1781), but did not explicitly authorize the Continental
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/20-1312
Brief for the Respondent at 48. Empire argues that the prior policy explicitly excluded patients who were
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-2/cla...
stages of this investigation saw some controversy over whether the House must explicitly authorize the initiation
Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc. | Supreme Court Bulletin | US Law | LII / Legal Informat
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/14-15
for Medicaid providers against states under the Supremacy Clause, even when Congress has not explicitly created the right
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lawrence_v._texas
protection of sexual privacy. The court in Lawrence v. Texas explicitly held that intimate consensual
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_41
a)(1)(A). This change does not affect established meaning. Rule 23.2 explicitly incorporates Rule 23(e
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-1/cla...
Air Regul. Grp. v. EPA , 573 U.S. 302 (2014) . Although the Court did not explicitly refer to the
WASHINGTON, et al., Appellants v. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. | Supreme Court | US Law | L
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/458/457
Pp. 467-487. (a) When a State allocates governmental power nonneutrally, by explicitly using the racial
10 U.S. Code § 3104 - Acquisition-related functions of chiefs of the armed forces | U.S. Code | US L
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/3104#c_1
A), or section 9014(c)(1)(A) of this title , except as explicitly provided in this