JamBot Logo
1-100 of about 432 matches for site:www.law.cornell.edu federal government's
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/federal_court
Court, U.S district courts, Courts of Appeal, and the U.S Supreme Court. Federal courts
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_16
government's possession, custody, or control if the attorney for the government knows—or through due
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11
determine that the defendant understands, the following: (A) the government's right, in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_9
subdivision (a), the language has been changed to accommodate the government's ability to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_12.2
notice under Rule 12.2(a), the court must, upon the government's motion, order the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_404
in order to limit the scope of the government's rebuttal. The
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_15
the deposition, any statement of the deponent in the government's possession to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_4
the order being appealed; or (ii) the filing of the government's notice of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_12.3
the request when the government serves its response to the defendant's notice under Rule 12
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_12.1
and Defendant's Response. (1) Government's Request. An attorney for the government may request in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_4
judge before whom the defendant will appear under Rule 5 . At the government's request, however, an
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_12
for the government's failure to comply with the court's order because the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-1674.ZO.html
to state parties were motivated by his interest in gaining the Federal Governments support for
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-1674.ZS.html
advertising; and for legislative advocacy advertisements, even if they mentioned a federal candidate’s name, so
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-1674.ZS.html
advertising; and for legislative advocacy advertisements, even if they mentioned a federal candidate’s name, so
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_32.2
record. (e) Subsequently Located Property; Substitute Property. (1) In General. On the government's motion, the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/5174
monitor and conduct quality assurance activities on a State or Indian tribal governments implementation of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-27/the-congre...
allowing the states to determine Members’ compensation would undermine the national governments stability but continued
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/20-828
to national security. FISA establishes procedures for judicial oversight of the governments electronic surveillance of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-6/articles-of-c...
345, 351–52 (Robert A. Rutland & William M.E. Rachal eds., 1975) . Article XIII’s ambiguity on federal supremacy
https://www.law.cornell.edu/executive-orders/clean-energy-industries-j...
to the effects of a changing climate, including advancing the Federal Governments strategic planning
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-205.ZS.html
to clarify §441b’s application on the points raised by the Governments position in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_35#rule_35_a
a Sentence for Substantial Assistance. (1) In General . Upon the government's motion made within
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_32.2
record. (e) Subsequently Located Property; Substitute Property. (1) In General. On the government's motion, the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-320.ZS.html
In Federal Election Comm’n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (WRTL) , 551 U. S. ___, this Court rejected
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_4
the order being appealed; or (ii) the filing of the government's notice of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_404
in order to limit the scope of the government's rebuttal. The
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_15/past
the deposition, any statement of the deponent in the government's possession to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-205.ZO.html
441b. See 540 U. S., at 205 (quoting Austin, 494 U. S. , at 660). McConnell permitted federal felony punishment for
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_12.3
the request when the government serves its response to the defendant's notice under Rule 12
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/388
AGENTS OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS. Supreme Court 403 U.S. 388 91 S.Ct. 1999 29 L
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_81
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit went beyond the Government's contention there, and
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_9
subdivision (a), the language has been changed to accommodate the government's ability to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_12
for the government's failure to comply with the court's order because the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_15
the deposition, any statement of the deponent in the government's possession to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_4
judge before whom the defendant will appear under Rule 5 . At the government's request, however, an
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_46#rule_46_j
set aside a bail forfeiture, the court must, upon the government's motion, enter a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_32#rule_32_i_2
Test the Confidentiality of Presentence Reports, 25 Fed.Prob. Dec. 1961, p. 6; Federal Judge's Views on
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_609
to do with credibility may result in unfair prejudice to the government's interest in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_44
the waiver colloque between defendant and judge, will also serve the government's interest by assisting
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_41#rule_41_e_2_A
as provided in Rule 41(f)(3) . (3) Delayed Notice. Upon the government's request, a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_32.1#rule_32_1_e
Appellate Procedure Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Federal Rules of Evidence
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_404
in order to limit the scope of the government's rebuttal. The
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_4
the order being appealed; or (ii) the filing of the government's notice of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11
determine that the defendant understands, the following: (A) the government's right, in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_41
as provided in Rule 41(f)(3) . (3) Delayed Notice. Upon the government's request, a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZS.html
he attempted to reenter the country–does not support the Governments argument that alien
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZS.html
he attempted to reenter the country–does not support the Governments argument that alien
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/category/statutes
and maritime power Admiralty and maritime powers refer to the federal governments ability to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/due_process
of life, liberty or property without due process of law" by the federal government. The Fourteenth
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/free-speech...
Appellate Procedure Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Federal Rules of Evidence
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1
Appellate Procedure Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Federal Rules of Evidence
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_15/past
the deposition, any statement of the deponent in the government's possession to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/abortion
to terminate their own pregnancy. The Court had determined that the governments interest in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-4/cla...
procedures, the Framers sought to prevent states from thwarting the Federal Governments operation by
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/strict_scrutiny
place, and manner restrictions ‘must be narrowly tailored to serve the governments legitimate, content-neutral
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commerce_clause
and ongoing controversy regarding the balance of power between the federal government and the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/category/keywords/constitutional_law
and maritime power Admiralty and maritime powers refer to the federal governments ability to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-4/cla...
elections only if “extraordinary circumstances might render that interposition necessary to [the U.S. Governments] safety.” 6 Footnote
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tax
Appellate Procedure Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Federal Rules of Evidence
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/category/constitution
and maritime power Admiralty and maritime powers refer to the federal governments ability to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_9
Issuance. The court must issue a warrant—or at the government's request, a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/due_process
states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-1056
b) The governments arguments fail to support the Ninth Circuit’s rule. The government
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-758
s) to share in the Governments sovereign immunity. 577 U. S., at 166. 6   This
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/sovereign_immunity
is a common law doctrine under which a sovereign (e.g., a federal or state government ) cannot
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-482
opinion. On remand, the Court of Appeals may consider the Governments separate arguments for
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-1287
Court for the District of Columbia. That court denied the Governments motion to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-1410.ZS.html
from the Governments “comprehensive control” over tribal coal. Held: The Tribe’s claim for compensation
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/08-1196
the usual balance of power between the states and federal government, the Court
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/expectation_of_privacy
violates this "expectation," then the government's action has violated the individual's Fourth Amendment rights. Elaborating
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZS.html
proceedings. In the first, the district judge granted the Governments motion to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/4321
development and enhancement of the total environment itself. The Governments environmentally-related activities
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-351
is a frequent point of contact between citizens and the Federal Government. In 2024
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/procedural_due_process
the government procedure’s erroneous deprivation of private interest in evaluating government conduct. On the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-6/early-doctrin...
charter it. In McCulloch , the Court sustained the federal governments power to charter
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/necessary_and_proper_clause
tax and spend. This decision established the scope of the federal governments power and
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/sovereign_immunity
wrong. In the United States, sovereign immunity typically applies to the federal government and state
https://www.law.cornell.edu/category/keywords/constitutional_law
maritime power (Wex page) Admiralty and Maritime powers refer to the federal governments ability to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/probable_cause
requiring a warrant supported by probable cause. The decision limited the governments ability to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/prior_restraint
Appellate Procedure Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Federal Rules of Evidence
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commerce_clause
and ongoing controversy regarding the balance of power between the federal government and the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1224.ZO.html
enough to allow for the expansion of the Federal Governments role.” New
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-6/overview-of-s...
the Clause to establish a robust role for the federal government in managing
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/08-876
to challenge the honest services jury instruction when he rejected the governments motion for
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/eminent_domain
with just compensation, even if the area is small and the government's use does not
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/08-1394
U.S.C. § 1346, requires the government to prove that the defendant's conduct was intended to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/denying-fin...
to deny financial aid. On that theory, religious entities have sometimes argued that the federal governments decision to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-8/overview-of...
the Bail Clause to one side, was to limit the governments power to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1478.ZO.html
cannot circumvent that prohibition by conscripting the State's officers directly. The Federal Government may neither issue
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/category/patent_law
and patent power Copyright and patent powers refers to the federal governments ability under
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/713
DOUGLAS joins, concurring. DP I adhere to the view that the Government's case against the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/300
in the judgment of the Secretary may best serve the Governments interest: Provided, That
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-352.ZS.html
his conviction. Pp. 3–12. (a) In light of the Governments concession of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-6/modern-doctri...
has narrowed the circumstances in which it applies. As the federal governments regulatory role
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/necessary_and_proper_clause
tax and spend. This decision established the scope of the federal governments power and
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/987
services, facilities, and information of any agency of the Federal Government, except that any
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-3/overview-of...
Overview of Third Amendment, Quartering Soldiers The Third Amendment limits the federal governments ability to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/30/1501
Appellate Procedure Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Federal Rules of Evidence
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/free-speech...
Government Roles Government Speech and Government as Speaker School Free Speech and Government as Educator Prison Free