JamBot Logo
1-100 of about 788 matches for site:www.law.cornell.edu site:www.law.cornell.edu authorized opinion
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/391
33 U.S. Code § 391 - Summary trials authorized | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us improve our site
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7323
5 U.S. Code § 7323 - Political activity authorized; prohibitions | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us improve our
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7323
5 U.S. Code § 7323 - Political activity authorized; prohibitions | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us improve our
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/14/541#
14 U.S. Code § 541 - Aids to navigation authorized | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us
https://www.law.cornell.edu/background/amistad/opinion.html
U.S. v. Amistad -- opinion of the Court Skip navigation LII Archival content Amistad (1998) THE UNITED
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZC.html
Court GONZALES V. RAICH (03-1454) 352 F.3d 1222, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Stevens ] Concurrence [ Scalia ] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZC.html
03-1454) 545 U.S. 1 (2005) 352 F.3d 1222, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Stevens ] Concurrence [ Scalia ] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/526/40
NOTE: This opinion is subject to revision before publication. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/393/503
A. Herrick, Des Moines, Iowa, for respondents. Mr. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/393/503
A. Herrick, Des Moines, Iowa, for respondents. Mr. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER (No. 07-290) 478 F. 3d 370, affirmed. Syllabus Opinion [Scalia] Dissent [Stevens] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_5
D) the reasons why the appeal should be allowed and is authorized by a statute
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap
proceedings then pending, except to the extent that in the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25-5442
in prison to 118 months, just 2 fewer than the maximum Congress authorized for his
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_5.2
or to immigration benefits or detention, access to an electronic file is authorized as follows: (1) the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_4
the court. The court must so order if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/335/469
Howard, of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-4/cla...
21 Footnote Id. at 13 (citing Vieth v. Jubelirer 541 U.S 267, 296 (2004) (plurality opinion)). See also Hunt v
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-758
the judgment. Alito , J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.   TOP Opinion NOTICE: This opinion is
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/517/44
S.Ct. 2666, 49 L.Ed.2d 614, and, in a plurality opinion, the Interstate
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/351
Washington U.S. Code prev | next The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, whenever in his
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6
attorney's duty to enforce federal criminal law; or (iii) a person authorized by 18 U.S.C. §3322
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frbp
Rule 9030 . Jurisdiction and Venue Not Extended or Limited. Rule 9031 . Using Masters Not Authorized. Rule 9032 . Effect of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/1252a
Reservoir projects, water storage; modification; storage for other than for water quality, opinion of Federal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bankruptcy
Program  to oversee the administration of bankruptcy proceedings, and authorized the U.S.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/23-719
U.S. Supreme Court TRUMP v. ANDERSON TRUMP v. ANDERSON Supreme Court   TOP Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1760
the Secretary with the State agencies and Indian Tribal organizations administering programs authorized under this chapter or
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/701c-1
and reservoir project, or channel improvement or channel rectification project for flood control, herein authorized or heretofore authorized by
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/269/55
Attorney General, for the United States. Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_9
warrant. The court must issue the arrest warrant to an officer authorized to execute
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/292
hearing the Secretary of Agriculture shall be of the opinion that such association monopolizes
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-II/chapter-216
review of Federal laws and practices relating to special grand juries authorized under chapter 216 of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-1410.ZS.html
v. NAVAJO NATION (No. 07-1410) 501 F. 3d 1327, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Scalia] Concurrence [Souter] HTML
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25-29
with an intent to humiliate and embarrass her.’ ” Id ., at 384 (majority opinion). Villarreal was detained at
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/military-pr...
overruled a lower court decision that, in reliance upon the dissenting opinion in Yamashita
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/212.5
at the expiration of the time for which parole was authorized, and in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZO.html
1195 and 06-1196) 476 F. 3d 981, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Kennedy] Concurrence [Souter] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-724
GROUP, INC. v. PALMQUIST 103 F. 4th 294, affirmed and remanded. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Sotomayor [Sotomayor Opinion] [PDF
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_14
& Co . (E.D.Mich. 1945) 9 Fed.Rules Serv. 14a.62, Case 3. See also concurring opinion of Circuit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-1257.ZS.html
4, affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Scalia ] Concurrence [ Thomas ] Concurrence
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/petty-offen...
penalty. 1 Footnote See Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 159–60 (1968) ( “[T]he penalty authorized for a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1337.ZS.html
V. MILLE LACS BAND OF CHIPPEWAINDIANS (97-1337) 124 F.3d 904, affirmed. Syllabus Opinion [ O’Connor ] Dissent [ Rehnquist
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/684
Code Notes prev | next The President of the United States is authorized to designate
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
enter the United States in violation of law. (iii) Waiver authorized The Attorney
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/485/681
the "similar acts" evidence under United States v. Ebens, 800 F.2d 1422 (CA6), which authorized courts to admit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-1287
Gorsuch Concurrence] [PDF] Concurrence , Barrett [Barrett Concurrence] [PDF] Opinion , Kagan [Kagan Opinion] [PDF] Opinion , Jackson [Jackson Opinion] [PDF] Dissent , Thomas [Thomas
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/343
description of the land inserted in any patent, said Secretary is authorized and directed
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/701g
U.S. Code Notes prev | next The Secretary of the Army is authorized to allot
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25A914
is not materially different from that in Skokie , we have jurisdiction.   We are likewise authorized to grant
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-1674.ZO.html
Rehnquist ] Dissent [ Stevens ] Other [ Opinion of Scalia ] Other [ Opinion of Thomas ] Other [ Opinion of Kennedy
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lawyer
Advertise Create Promote Join Lawyer Directory LII Wex lawyer lawyer Primary tabs An individual who is authorized to practice
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/331/745
of Charleston, W. Va., for respondents. Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frbp
Rule 9030 . Jurisdiction and Venue Not Extended or Limited. Rule 9031 . Using Masters Not Authorized. Rule 9032 . Effect of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZS.html
1195 and 06-1196) 476 F. 3d 981, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Kennedy] Concurrence [Souter] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/225/264
Hank for defendant in error. Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/299/304
to lay, regulate and revoke embargoes. He was 'authorized' 'whenever, in his opinion, the public
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/675
in the State of South Dakota, as should, in the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-1056
STATES Supreme Court   Syllabus RICO v. UNITED STATES Reversed and remanded. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Gorsuch [Gorsuch Opinion] [PDF
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/113/568
the treasury had uniformly held that longevity pay to retired officers was not authorized by section 1593 of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/683
Code Notes prev | next The President of the United States is authorized to designate
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23
the court may award reasonable attorney's fees and nontaxable costs that are authorized by law or by
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bankruptcy
Program  to oversee the administration of bankruptcy proceedings, and authorized the U.S.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/441/130
Louise Korns, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Mr. Justice REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/144
the legend, “Federal Inc. U.S.A.”, and which shall not, in the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/438/586
in part and remanded. THE CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZS.html
F.3d 279 and 208 F.3d 815, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Breyer ] Dissent [ Scalia ] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZS.html
F.3d 279 and 208 F.3d 815, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Breyer ] Dissent [ Scalia ] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZD1.html
Court GONZALES V. RAICH (03-1454) 352 F.3d 1222, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Stevens ] Concurrence [ Scalia ] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/305/337
of Counsel from pages 339-341 intentionally omitted] Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/310/296
the exercise of judgment, and the formation of an opinion. He is authorized to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/499f
petition, which shall briefly state the facts, whereupon, if, in the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/80/166
Territory, approved March 10th, 1848, by which one Curtis Reed and his associates were authorized to construct
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/481/279
8 753 F.2d 877 (11th Cir.1985), affirmed. 9 POWELL, J., delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/cla...
the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/1536
and with the assistance of the Secretary, insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/833a
to prevent the monopolization thereof by limited groups, the Bureau is authorized and directed
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-1/inh...
judgment as an essential attribute of judicial power. In that year, Congress authorized Revolutionary War veterans to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap
proceedings then pending, except to the extent that in the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/unanimity-o...
outcome was significant for the two states—Oregon and Louisiana—that authorized non unanimous verdicts in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/299/304
to lay, regulate and revoke embargoes. He was 'authorized' 'whenever, in his opinion, the public
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/sentencing-...
factor. 6 Footnote Id. The “standard range,” therefore, constituted the maximum sentence authorized “ without any additional findings
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/266/71
of Columbus, Ohio, for State Treasurer. Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/379/433
Edwin F. Hunt, Atlanta, Ga., for appellees. Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/487/450
30, 1988. Decided June 24, 1988. Syllabus Under North Dakota statutes, thinly populated school districts are authorized to "reorganize
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-1/mar...
1789. 2 Footnote 1 Stat. 73 , 80 . The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11
offense charged is one for which a different or additional punishment is authorized by reason of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23
the court may award reasonable attorney's fees and nontaxable costs that are authorized by law or by
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-1/ori...
by legislative act an intelligible principle to which the person or body authorized [ ] is directed to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1224.ZO.html
STATES v. COMSTOCK ( No. 08-1224 ) 551 F. 3d 274, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Breyer] Concurrence [Kennedy] Concurrence
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/272/317
Coke, of Portland, Or., for appellees. Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1522
determines can best perform the services . Payments may be made for activities authorized under this subchapter in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/713
Amendment and refused to make such a law. 5 See concurring opinion of Mr
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1522
determines can best perform the services . Payments may be made for activities authorized under this subchapter in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-1/ove...
time to time ordain and establish,” 2 Footnote Id. and authorized Congress, in its
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-351
POSTAL SERVICE v. KONAN 96 F. 4th 799, vacated and remanded. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Thomas [Thomas Opinion] [PDF
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/246/146
for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-1/cla...
Case: The Limits of Presidential Power (1977) . In a concurring opinion, Justice Robert Jackson set
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/203/38
of Counsel from pages 43-46 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/535/137
born in Mexico, that he had never been legally admitted to, or authorized to work
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/cla...
the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing