1-100 of about 788 matches for site:www.law.cornell.edu site:www.law.cornell.edu authorized opinion
33 U.S. Code § 391 - Summary trials authorized | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Instit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/391
33 U.S. Code § 391 - Summary trials authorized | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us improve our site
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7323
5 U.S. Code § 7323 - Political activity authorized; prohibitions | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us improve our
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7323
5 U.S. Code § 7323 - Political activity authorized; prohibitions | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us improve our
14 U.S. Code § 541 - Aids to navigation authorized | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information In
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/14/541#
14 U.S. Code § 541 - Aids to navigation authorized | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us
https://www.law.cornell.edu/background/amistad/opinion.html
U.S. v. Amistad -- opinion of the Court Skip navigation LII Archival content Amistad (1998) THE UNITED
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZC.html
Court GONZALES V. RAICH (03-1454) 352 F.3d 1222, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Stevens ] Concurrence [ Scalia ] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZC.html
03-1454) 545 U.S. 1 (2005) 352 F.3d 1222, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Stevens ] Concurrence [ Scalia ] Dissent
NOTE: This opinion is subject to revision before publication. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/526/40
NOTE: This opinion is subject to revision before publication. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
John F. TINKER and Mary Beth Tinker, Minors, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT CO
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/393/503
A. Herrick, Des Moines, Iowa, for respondents. Mr. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the
John F. TINKER and Mary Beth Tinker, Minors, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT CO
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/393/503
A. Herrick, Des Moines, Iowa, for respondents. Mr. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER (No. 07-290) 478 F. 3d 370, affirmed. Syllabus Opinion [Scalia] Dissent [Stevens] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_5
D) the reasons why the appeal should be allowed and is authorized by a statute
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap
proceedings then pending, except to the extent that in the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25-5442
in prison to 118 months, just 2 fewer than the maximum Congress authorized for his
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_5.2
or to immigration benefits or detention, access to an electronic file is authorized as follows: (1) the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_4
the court. The court must so order if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/335/469
Howard, of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-4/cla...
21 Footnote Id. at 13 (citing Vieth v. Jubelirer 541 U.S 267, 296 (2004) (plurality opinion)). See also Hunt v
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-758
the judgment. Alito , J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. TOP Opinion NOTICE: This opinion is
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/517/44
S.Ct. 2666, 49 L.Ed.2d 614, and, in a plurality opinion, the Interstate
25 U.S. Code § 351 - Patents with restrictions for lots in villages in Washington | U.S. Code | US L
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/351
Washington U.S. Code prev | next The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, whenever in his
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6
attorney's duty to enforce federal criminal law; or (iii) a person authorized by 18 U.S.C. §3322
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frbp
Rule 9030 . Jurisdiction and Venue Not Extended or Limited. Rule 9031 . Using Masters Not Authorized. Rule 9032 . Effect of
33 U.S. Code § 1252a - Reservoir projects, water storage; modification; storage for other than for w
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/1252a
Reservoir projects, water storage; modification; storage for other than for water quality, opinion of Federal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bankruptcy
Program to oversee the administration of bankruptcy proceedings, and authorized the U.S.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/23-719
U.S. Supreme Court TRUMP v. ANDERSON TRUMP v. ANDERSON Supreme Court TOP Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to
42 U.S. Code § 1760 - Miscellaneous provisions | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Instit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1760
the Secretary with the State agencies and Indian Tribal organizations administering programs authorized under this chapter or
33 U.S. Code § 701c–1 - Acquirement of titles for certain projects and to lands, easements, rights-o
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/701c-1
and reservoir project, or channel improvement or channel rectification project for flood control, herein authorized or heretofore authorized by
OLD DOMINION LAND CO. v. UNITED STATES. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/269/55
Attorney General, for the United States. Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_9
warrant. The court must issue the arrest warrant to an officer authorized to execute
7 U.S. Code § 292 - Monopolizing or restraining trade and unduly enhancing prices prohibited; remedy
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/292
hearing the Secretary of Agriculture shall be of the opinion that such association monopolizes
18 U.S. Code Chapter 216 - SPECIAL GRAND JURY | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institu
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-II/chapter-216
review of Federal laws and practices relating to special grand juries authorized under chapter 216 of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-1410.ZS.html
v. NAVAJO NATION (No. 07-1410) 501 F. 3d 1327, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Scalia] Concurrence [Souter] HTML
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25-29
with an intent to humiliate and embarrass her.’ ” Id ., at 384 (majority opinion). Villarreal was detained at
Military Proceedings and Procedural Due Process | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/military-pr...
overruled a lower court decision that, in reliance upon the dissenting opinion in Yamashita
8 CFR § 212.5 - Parole of aliens into the United States. | Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/212.5
at the expiration of the time for which parole was authorized, and in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZO.html
1195 and 06-1196) 476 F. 3d 981, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Kennedy] Concurrence [Souter] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-724
GROUP, INC. v. PALMQUIST 103 F. 4th 294, affirmed and remanded. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Sotomayor [Sotomayor Opinion] [PDF
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_14
& Co . (E.D.Mich. 1945) 9 Fed.Rules Serv. 14a.62, Case 3. See also concurring opinion of Circuit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-1257.ZS.html
4, affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Scalia ] Concurrence [ Thomas ] Concurrence
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/petty-offen...
penalty. 1 Footnote See Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 159–60 (1968) ( “[T]he penalty authorized for a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1337.ZS.html
V. MILLE LACS BAND OF CHIPPEWAINDIANS (97-1337) 124 F.3d 904, affirmed. Syllabus Opinion [ OConnor ] Dissent [ Rehnquist
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/684
Code Notes prev | next The President of the United States is authorized to designate
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
enter the United States in violation of law. (iii) Waiver authorized The Attorney
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/485/681
the "similar acts" evidence under United States v. Ebens, 800 F.2d 1422 (CA6), which authorized courts to admit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-1287
Gorsuch Concurrence] [PDF] Concurrence , Barrett [Barrett Concurrence] [PDF] Opinion , Kagan [Kagan Opinion] [PDF] Opinion , Jackson [Jackson Opinion] [PDF] Dissent , Thomas [Thomas
25 U.S. Code § 343 - Correction of errors in allotments and patents | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Leg
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/343
description of the land inserted in any patent, said Secretary is authorized and directed
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/701g
U.S. Code Notes prev | next The Secretary of the Army is authorized to allot
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25A914
is not materially different from that in Skokie , we have jurisdiction. We are likewise authorized to grant
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-1674.ZO.html
Rehnquist ] Dissent [ Stevens ] Other [ Opinion of Scalia ] Other [ Opinion of Thomas ] Other [ Opinion of Kennedy
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lawyer
Advertise Create Promote Join Lawyer Directory LII Wex lawyer lawyer Primary tabs An individual who is authorized to practice
UNITED STATES v. DICKINSON. SAME v. WITHROW. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Inst
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/331/745
of Charleston, W. Va., for respondents. Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure | US Law | LII / Legal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frbp
Rule 9030 . Jurisdiction and Venue Not Extended or Limited. Rule 9031 . Using Masters Not Authorized. Rule 9032 . Effect of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZS.html
1195 and 06-1196) 476 F. 3d 981, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Kennedy] Concurrence [Souter] Dissent
NORFOLK & SUBURBAN TURNPIKE COMPANY, Plff. in Err., v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. | Supreme Court | U
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/225/264
Hank for defendant in error. Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the
UNITED STATES v. CURTISS-WRIGHT EXPORT CORPORATION et al. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/299/304
to lay, regulate and revoke embargoes. He was 'authorized' 'whenever, in his opinion, the public
16 U.S. Code § 675 - Norbeck Wildlife Preserve; establishment | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/675
in the State of South Dakota, as should, in the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-1056
STATES Supreme Court Syllabus RICO v. UNITED STATES Reversed and remanded. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Gorsuch [Gorsuch Opinion] [PDF
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/113/568
the treasury had uniformly held that longevity pay to retired officers was not authorized by section 1593 of
16 U.S. Code § 683 - Areas set aside for protection of game and fish; unlawfully taking game or fish
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/683
Code Notes prev | next The President of the United States is authorized to designate
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23
the court may award reasonable attorney's fees and nontaxable costs that are authorized by law or by
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bankruptcy
Program to oversee the administration of bankruptcy proceedings, and authorized the U.S.
Daniel BURCH et al., Petitioners, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Info
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/441/130
Louise Korns, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Mr. Justice REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the
15 U.S. Code § 144 - China trade corporations | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institu
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/144
the legend, “Federal Inc. U.S.A.”, and which shall not, in the opinion of the
Sandra LOCKETT, Petitioner, v. State of OHIO. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Ins
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/438/586
in part and remanded. THE CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZS.html
F.3d 279 and 208 F.3d 815, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Breyer ] Dissent [ Scalia ] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZS.html
F.3d 279 and 208 F.3d 815, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Breyer ] Dissent [ Scalia ] Dissent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZD1.html
Court GONZALES V. RAICH (03-1454) 352 F.3d 1222, vacated and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [ Stevens ] Concurrence [ Scalia ] Dissent
STATE OF MISSOURI et rel. GAINES v. CANADA et al. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/305/337
of Counsel from pages 339-341 intentionally omitted] Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the
CANTWELL et al. v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institut
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/310/296
the exercise of judgment, and the formation of an opinion. He is authorized to
7 U.S. Code § 499f - Complaints, written notifications, and investigations | U.S. Code | US Law | LI
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/499f
petition, which shall briefly state the facts, whereupon, if, in the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/80/166
Territory, approved March 10th, 1848, by which one Curtis Reed and his associates were authorized to construct
Warren McCLESKEY, Petitioner v. Ralph KEMP, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Ce
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/481/279
8 753 F.2d 877 (11th Cir.1985), affirmed. 9 POWELL, J., delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/cla...
the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing
16 U.S. Code § 1536 - Interagency cooperation | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institu
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/1536
and with the assistance of the Secretary, insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out
16 U.S. Code § 833a - Administration of project | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Insti
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/833a
to prevent the monopolization thereof by limited groups, the Bureau is authorized and directed
Inherent Power to Issue Judgments | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-1/inh...
judgment as an essential attribute of judicial power. In that year, Congress authorized Revolutionary War veterans to
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure | Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure | US Law | LII / Legal I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap
proceedings then pending, except to the extent that in the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/unanimity-o...
outcome was significant for the two states—Oregon and Louisiana—that authorized non unanimous verdicts in
UNITED STATES v. CURTISS-WRIGHT EXPORT CORPORATION et al. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/299/304
to lay, regulate and revoke embargoes. He was 'authorized' 'whenever, in his opinion, the public
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/sentencing-...
factor. 6 Footnote Id. The “standard range,” therefore, constituted the maximum sentence authorized “ without any additional findings
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/266/71
of Columbus, Ohio, for State Treasurer. Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the
Ben W. FORTSON, Jr., Secretary of State of the State of Georgia, Appellant, v. James W. DORSEY et al
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/379/433
Edwin F. Hunt, Atlanta, Ga., for appellees. Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/487/450
30, 1988. Decided June 24, 1988. Syllabus Under North Dakota statutes, thinly populated school districts are authorized to "reorganize
Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Informat
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-1/mar...
1789. 2 Footnote 1 Stat. 73 , 80 . The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11
offense charged is one for which a different or additional punishment is authorized by reason of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23
the court may award reasonable attorney's fees and nontaxable costs that are authorized by law or by
Origin of Intelligible Principle Standard | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Infor
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-1/ori...
by legislative act an intelligible principle to which the person or body authorized [ ] is directed to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1224.ZO.html
STATES v. COMSTOCK ( No. 08-1224 ) 551 F. 3d 274, reversed and remanded. Syllabus Opinion [Breyer] Concurrence [Kennedy] Concurrence
MOORE, Insurance Commissioner, v. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. et al. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Leg
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/272/317
Coke, of Portland, Or., for appellees. Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the
8 U.S. Code § 1522 - Authorization for programs for domestic resettlement of and assistance to refug
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1522
determines can best perform the services . Payments may be made for activities authorized under this subchapter in
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. The WASHINGTON P
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/713
Amendment and refused to make such a law. 5 See concurring opinion of Mr
8 U.S. Code § 1522 - Authorization for programs for domestic resettlement of and assistance to refug
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1522
determines can best perform the services . Payments may be made for activities authorized under this subchapter in
Overview of Establishment of Article III Courts | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-1/ove...
time to time ordain and establish,” 2 Footnote Id. and authorized Congress, in its
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-351
POSTAL SERVICE v. KONAN 96 F. 4th 799, vacated and remanded. Syllabus [Syllabus] [PDF] Opinion , Thomas [Thomas Opinion] [PDF
LOCOMOBILE CO. OF AMERICA v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/246/146
for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the
The President's Powers and Youngstown Framework | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-1/cla...
Case: The Limits of Presidential Power (1977) . In a concurring opinion, Justice Robert Jackson set
TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. E. J. McLEAN & COMPANY, Appt. v. DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPAN
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/203/38
of Counsel from pages 43-46 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/535/137
born in Mexico, that he had never been legally admitted to, or authorized to work
Response to Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / L
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/cla...
the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing