1-100 of about 466 matches for site:www.law.cornell.edu site:www.law.cornell.edu site:www.law.cornell.edu explicitly
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/163/537
PLESSY v. FERGUSON. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us improve our site! × No thank
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/163/537
PLESSY v. FERGUSON. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Please help us improve our site! × No thank
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/authority
of agency, authority may be actual, implied, apparent, or constructive. Actual authority is expressly or explicitly delegated by a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_411
previously provided that evidence was not excluded if offered for a purpose not explicitly prohibited by the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_8
the district court during the pendency of an appeal is not explicitly conferred by statute, it
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commerce_clause
is a source of controversy, as the Constitution does not explicitly define the word
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_407
previously provided that evidence was not excluded if offered for a purpose not explicitly prohibited by the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/23-719#content
is an “office” under the United States. Anderson asserts that the Constitution explicitly refers to the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frbp/rule_1015
a) to include cases regarding the same debtor, the rule explicitly recognizes that the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/15
the joint session shall be limited to performing solely ministerial duties. (2) Powers explicitly denied.— The President
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/criminal_law
acquitted . Ex Post Facto An ex post facto law retroactively punishes actions. The Constitution explicitly forbids this practices in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-777
requires deference only for “findings of fact” and no subparagraph explicitly addresses the mixed
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fifth_amendment
the federal government, the identical text in the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly applies this due process
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_4
addressed in Rule 1101(d)(3), Federal Rules of Evidence . That rule explicitly provides that the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_12
conducted under the Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 26.2(c) now explicitly states that the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_5.1
of a defendant at a preliminary examination. This issue is not dealt with explicitly in the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/due_process
so through criminal law, for which the Bill of Rights explicitly stated quite a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_9
because the accompanying affidavits were defective. Although the Court's opinion did not explicitly state that the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25-457
institut[e] any civil action”: $350, per case. §1914(a). Thus, if anything, Congress explicitly forbade the result
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/repeal
Repeal can be explicit or implicit. For example, the Twenty-First Amendment explicitly repealed the Eighteenth
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_16
pretrial phase, especially motions and discovery. In addition, the amendment explicitly recognizes some of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107
the purpose and character of the use”—to state explicitly that this factor includes
https://www.law.cornell.edu/category/keywords/first_amendment
22 U.S.C. 7631(f), which requires an organization to have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_408
previously provided that evidence was not excluded if offered for a purpose not explicitly prohibited by the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/category/keywords/elections
United States Constitution declares that state legislatures shall determine state election laws, but it does not explicitly state whether state courts
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_404
of doubt that the drafters of F.R.Evi. 404(a) explicitly intended that all character
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frbp/rule_1019
was amended by adding the second sentence to the Note stating explicitly that the rule
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/stare_decisis
in deciding Brown v. Board of Education , the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly renounced Plessy v. Ferguson
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/griswold_v_connecticut_(1965)
a right to privacy existed within the Constitution , which does not explicitly exist in the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/employment_discrimination
each person receives equal protection of the laws. The Fourteenth Amendment explicitly prohibits states from violating
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/08-876
the honest services provision as a fourth type of scheme, Congress explicitly enacted it within the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Preemption
the local municipalities can legislate only in areas where the state has explicitly allowed the local
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_5
the rule to the Federal Magistrates Act; and to deal explicitly in the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_15
a deposition at trial, it must be transcribed. The proposed rule did not explicitly provide for payment
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1521.ZO.html
Quilici v. Morton Grove , 695 F. 2d 261 (CA7 1982)), and that Heller had explicitly refrained from “opin[ing
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/vagueness_doctrine
doctrine The vagueness doctrine is a Constitutional requirement that criminal laws must explicitly state and define
I am tired of receiving spam emails. How do I file a CAN-SPAM suit? | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/inbox/can-spam_and_consumer_lawsuits
violations of state anti-spam statutes.However, many state statutes that deal with spam are explicitly preempted by the
Rule 53. Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited | Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure |
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_53
reference to “broadcasting” is appropriate. Also, although the revised rule does not explicitly recognize exceptions within the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/authority
of agency, authority may either be actual or implied/apparent/constructive. Actual authority is expressly or explicitly delegated by a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-482
Legislation.” Ibid . In fact, “[a]ll the delegates who spoke explicitly or implicitly regarded an
29 CFR § 1604.11 - Sexual harassment. | Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) | US Law | LI
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1604.11
sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when (1) submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/substantive_due_process
tradition, viewed in light of evolving social norms. These rights are not explicitly listed in the
I am tired of receiving spam emails. How do I file a CAN-SPAM suit? | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/inbox/can-spam_and_consumer_lawsuits
violations of state anti-spam statutes.However, many state statutes that deal with spam are explicitly preempted by the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/vagueness_doctrine
doctrine The vagueness doctrine is a Constitutional requirement that criminal laws must explicitly state and define
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/clayton_antitrust_act
damages and an injunction . Notably, unlike the Sherman Act, labor unions are explicitly excluded from needing to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/authority
of agency, authority may be actual, implied, apparent, or constructive. Actual authority is expressly or explicitly delegated by a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/duty_of_care
and officers insurance (D&O insurance), and waivers of liability . Indemnification is explicitly allowed by some corporate
Rule 53. Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited | Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure |
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_53
reference to “broadcasting” is appropriate. Also, although the revised rule does not explicitly recognize exceptions within the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/251
or policy of the Commission, until such restrictions and obligations are explicitly superseded by regulations prescribed
21 U.S. Code § 823 - Registration requirements | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Instit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/823
research protocol described in item (aa) if the Attorney General does not explicitly object during the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/employment_discrimination
each person receives equal protection of the laws. The Fourteenth Amendment explicitly prohibits states from violating
Ratification of Thirteenth Amendment | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Informatio
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-13/ratificati...
the right to equal treatment in public places—a right explicitly recognized to be
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/laws-that-d...
101–03 (1945) (plurality opinion). The Court has upheld some statutes that did not explicitly include such a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-8508.ZS.html
361: A search does not occureven when its object is a house explicitly protected by the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/substantive_due_process
tradition, viewed in light of evolving social norms. These rights are not explicitly listed in the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/information
complaint that the prosecuting attorney (or sometimes some other law officer) usually files. It explicitly states that supposed crimes
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/agency
principal can be bound by an agent’s act made with apparent authority even if they explicitly stated that the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tenancy_in_common
and B as tenants in common." Further, if a conveyance does not explicitly show an intent to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/judicial_review
create the law. While this consideration is often implicit, many judges and justices explicitly rely on it to
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/rescind
the parties’ agreement to rescind their 1938 Agreement where a new contract explicitly stated that it “will
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/express
the parties to a contract. Express contract is direct and explicitly stated and nothing
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Law
countries, such as Japan , employ a civil law system, which relies on codes that explicitly specify the rules
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2A/2A-217
lease contract refers may be made at any time and in any manner explicitly agreed to by
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/constitution
etc.). In many cases, "constitution" refers to a single written document that explicitly creates government institutions, defines
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Constitution
etc.). In many cases, "constitution" refers to a single written document that explicitly creates government institutions, defines
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/covenant_not_to_compete
not only void the “unreasonable” noncompete clause, but all noncompete clauses other than those explicitly allowed in the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/sexual_harassment
a sexual nature constitutes sexual harassment when: Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/duty_of_care
and officers insurance (D&O insurance), and waivers of liability . Indemnification is explicitly allowed by some corporate
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/civil_liberties
its citizens . As such, the First Amendment's language (" congress shall make no law") explicitly prohibits the government
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/open_mines_doctrine
cannot open any new mines on the land. The doctrine is not explicitly restricted to mining
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/precedent
only for issues, given the particular facts, that the court explicitly considered in reaching
Review of Evidentiary Record | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information Instit
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-7/review-of-e...
372, 389 (1943) . The Galloway Court wrote: “the practice has been approved explicitly in the
Equal Sovereignty Doctrine | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institut
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-10/equal-sove...
constitutional provision, is unclear from the Court’s cases. Although the Constitution explicitly mandates equal treatment of
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/2703
other games similar to bingo, and (ii) card games that— (I) are explicitly authorized by the
Rule 8. Stay or Injunction Pending Appeal | Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure | US Law | LII / Le
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_8
the district court during the pendency of an appeal is not explicitly conferred by statute, it
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/24-557
to the assistance and guidance of counsel.” Id ., at 91. Geders explicitly reserved judgment regarding the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/criminal_law
acquitted . Ex Post Facto An ex post facto law retroactively punishes actions. The Constitution explicitly forbids this practices in
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Privacy
found a right to privacy, derived from penumbras of other explicitly stated constitutional protections. The
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/habeas_corpus
the writ. In the first Judiciary Act of 1789 , Congress explicitly authorized the federal
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commerce_clause
the regulatory authority of the States. The Constitution does not explicitly define the word
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/248a
1) All Federal Reserve bank services covered by the fee schedule shall be priced explicitly. (2) All Federal Reserve
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-8508.ZS.html
361: A search does not occureven when its object is a house explicitly protected by the
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1092
policies and sanctions related to copyright infringement, including— (i) an annual disclosure that explicitly informs students that unauthorized
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/467/837
contrary to law. Although recognizing that the amended Clean Air Act does not explicitly define what Congress envisioned
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/16-424
the constitutionality of the statute underlying his conviction unless that right is explicitly preserved in the
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/499/187
jobs, respondent's policy creates a facial classification based on gender and explicitly discriminates against women on
Historical Background on Taxing Power | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Informati
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-8/cla...
all land within each State,’ Articles of Confederation art. VIII (1781) , but did not explicitly authorize the Continental
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-13/overview-o...
Seats in the House of Representatives. Subsequently, the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly repealed the Three
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/when-the-ri...
the Due Process Clause and not from one of the explicitly defined procedural safeguards of
Right to a Public Trial Doctrine | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information In
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/right-to-a-...
the Due Process Clause and not from one of the explicitly defined procedural safeguards of
11 U.S. Code § 552 - Postpetition effect of security interest | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/11/552
security interest in proceeds, product, offspring, rents, or profits, the section is explicitly subject to other
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/elections
however, mandates that the people directly elect the senators, and explicitly bars state legislatures from
19 U.S. Code § 2504 - Relationship of trade agreements to United States law | U.S. Code | US Law | L
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/19/2504
any private right of action or remedy for which provision is not explicitly made under this Act
Rule 54. Judgment; Costs | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | US Law | LII / Legal Information Insti
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_54
ch. 110, §50(2) (Smith-Hurd 1956). The amendment accomplishes this purpose by referring explicitly to parties
12 U.S. Code § 1831d - State-chartered insured depository institutions and insured branches of forei
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/1831d
have voted in favor of any provision, constitutional or otherwise, which states explicitly and by
Historical Background on Ex Post Facto Laws | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Inf
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-9/cla...
of their effect and permit individuals to rely on their meaning until explicitly changed” and “restricts
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/general-pri...
no sect.” ). But a law may “respect” an establishment even if it does not explicitly establish a religion
Evacuation of the West Coast Japanese | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Informati
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/cla...
forcible relocation of U.S. citizens to concentration camps, solely and explicitly on the basis
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Privacy
found a right to privacy, derived from penumbras of other explicitly stated constitutional protections. The
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/privacy
found a right to privacy, derived from penumbras of other explicitly stated constitutional protections. The