RFC 8446: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML ] [ Tracker ] [ IPR ] [ Errata

RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2 [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML ] [ Tracker ] [ IPR ] [ Errata

RFC 8446: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML ] [ Tracker ] [ IPR ] [ Errata

RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2 [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML ] [ Tracker ] [ IPR ] [ Errata

and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Abstract Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) are used

RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2 [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML ] [ Tracker ] [ IPR ] [ Errata

RFC 8446: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML ] [ Tracker ] [ IPR ] [ Errata

and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Abstract Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) are used

RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2 [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML ] [ Tracker ] [ IPR ] [ Errata

RFC 4346: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.1 [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML ] [ Tracker ] [ IPR ] [ Errata

RFC 4346: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.1 [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML ] [ Tracker ] [ IPR ] [ Errata

RFC 8446: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML ] [ Tracker ] [ IPR ] [ Errata

1 . Floor Participant to Floor Control Server Interface Floor participants request a floor by sending a

order to generate forged floor requests or to grant or deny existing floor requests. Client impersonation is

and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Abstract Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) are used

and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Abstract Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) are widely

RFC 7919: Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS) [ RFC Home ] [ TEXT | PDF | HTML

Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved. Abstract This document describes Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), an application-layer control (signaling) protocol for

4.2 . SILK Decoder .............................................. 32 4.2.1 . SILK Decoder Modules ............................... 32 4.2.2 . LP Layer Organization .............................. 33 4.2

4.2 . SILK Decoder .............................................. 32 4.2.1 . SILK Decoder Modules ............................... 32 4.2.2 . LP Layer Organization .............................. 33 4.2

4.2 . SILK Decoder .............................................. 32 4.2.1 . SILK Decoder Modules ............................... 32 4.2.2 . LP Layer Organization .............................. 33 4.2

4.2. SILK Decoder ..............................................32 4.2.1. SILK Decoder Modules ...............................32 4.2.2. LP Layer Organization ..............................33 4.2

4.2. SILK Decoder ..............................................32 4.2.1. SILK Decoder Modules ...............................32 4.2.2. LP Layer Organization ..............................33 4.2

round trips needed for a new EAP exchange. Delays incurred within each protocol layer affect the ongoing

round trips needed for a new EAP exchange. Delays incurred within each protocol layer affect the ongoing

Layer 2 Forwarding (L2F) L2SS - L2-Specific Sublayer (L2SS) L2TP - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) L2VPN *- Layer 2 Virtual Private Network

Netscape Communications ISSN: 2070-1721 P. Kocher Independent Consultant August 2011 The Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Protocol Version 3

of which are to be modular. E.g., in the Host-Host layer of the

rules defined by that layer. Not every element specified by the protocol contains every layer. Furthermore, the elements

rules defined by that layer. Not every element specified by the protocol contains every layer. Furthermore, the elements

All Rights Reserved. Abstract This document specifies Version 1.0 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. The

rules defined by that layer. Not every element specified by the protocol contains every layer. Furthermore, the elements

rules defined by that layer. Not every element specified by the protocol contains every layer. Furthermore, the elements

Search RFCs Advanced Search RFC Editor RFC 5018 Connection Establishment in the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP), September

Independent Obsoletes: 2246 E. Rescorla Category: Standards Track RTFM, Inc. April 2006 The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version

Independent Obsoletes: 2246 E. Rescorla Category: Standards Track RTFM, Inc. April 2006 The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version

All Rights Reserved. Abstract This document specifies Version 1.0 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. The

All Rights Reserved. Abstract This document specifies Version 1.0 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. The

4366 E. Rescorla Updates: 4492 RTFM, Inc. Category: Standards Track August 2008 The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version

4366 E. Rescorla Updates: 4492 RTFM, Inc. Category: Standards Track August 2008 The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version

Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved. Abstract This document describes Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), an application-layer control (signaling) protocol for

All the communications SHOULD take place over a secure channel, e.g., Secure Socket Layer/Transport Layer Security (SSL

All the communications SHOULD take place over a secure channel, e.g., Secure Socket Layer/Transport Layer Security (SSL

and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Abstract Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) are used

agents) and proxies (proxies forward the response upstream, the transaction layer at user agents forwards

6961 August 2018 Updates: 5705, 6066 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version

agents) and proxies (proxies forward the response upstream, the transaction layer at user agents forwards

agents) and proxies (proxies forward the response upstream, the transaction layer at user agents forwards

6961 August 2018 Updates: 5705, 6066 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version

to adhere to those stricter requirements. Furthermore, this document provides a floor, not a ceiling

6961 August 2018 Updates: 5705, 6066 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version

6961 August 2018 Updates: 5705, 6066 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version

Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 Abstract This document formally deprecates Transport Layer Security (TLS) versions 1

encode (v): if (v == 0) return (0, 0) if (v < 2 * C) // subnormal a = floor (v * 4 / C) // round

All the communications SHOULD take place over a secure channel, e.g., Secure Socket Layer/Transport Layer Security (SSL

All the communications SHOULD take place over a secure channel, e.g., Secure Socket Layer/Transport Layer Security (SSL

encode (v): if (v == 0) return (0, 0) if (v < 2 * C) // subnormal a = floor (v * 4 / C) // round

about the underlying transport and network-layer protocols. The lower-layer can provide either a

to adhere to those stricter requirements. Furthermore, this document provides a floor, not a ceiling

to adhere to those stricter requirements. Furthermore, this document provides a floor, not a ceiling

to adhere to those stricter requirements. Furthermore, this document provides a floor, not a ceiling

is located. Furthermore, since many existing IP services such as lpr *do* already use additional application-layer demultiplexing information such as

result in churn, alarm flapping, etc. 4.6 . Alarm Suppression, Aggregation, and Layer Coordination Network elements MUST

a secure environment, by securing the submission connection at the transport layer, or by using an

Figure 1 shows the assumed communication model for both a Layer 7 location configuration protocol

interfaces to support IP. (For example, devices without IP, such as MAC-layer bridges, could not be

a high level of practical security in cryptographic applications, including Transport Layer Security (TLS). These curves

a high level of practical security in cryptographic applications, including Transport Layer Security (TLS). These curves

and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Abstract Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) are widely

current DESCRIPTION "The physical location of this node (e.g., `telephone closet, 3rd floor'). If the location

Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................8 1.1. Design Principles ..........................................8 1.2. Expectations of Link-Layer Type ...........................10 2. Terminology

of which are to be modular. E.g., in the Host-Host layer of the