1-100 of about 585 matches for site:www.saflii.org formally supported
Faber JT --- "Uncertainty About the Condonation of Formally Non-Compliant Wills, and the Rectificati
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2022/70.html
Faber JT --- "Uncertainty About the Condonation of Formally Non-Compliant Wills, and the Rectification
Uncertainty About the Condonation of Formally Non-Compliant Wills, and the Reflection of Cross-Signe
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2022/6.html
Uncertainty About the Condonation of Formally Non-Compliant Wills, and the Reflection of
Uncertainty About the Condonation of Formally Non-Compliant Wills, and the Reflection of Cross-Signe
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2022/6.html
Uncertainty About the Condonation of Formally Non-Compliant Wills, and the Reflection of
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/ADRY/2015/1.html
settings and in the form of ‘informal care’ which is not formally recognised or supported through
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/ADRY/2015/1.html
settings and in the form of ‘informal care’ which is not formally recognised or supported through
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2001/226.html
the respondents still persists in their stance that the order I gave, (supported by reasons), should be
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2001/85.html
ostensible jurisdiction to deal with the matter, NUMSA, on 12 October 1999, formally referred the dispute
Rainbow Drivers & Crews (Pty) Ltd v Commission of Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (JR 531/01)
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2003/19.html
may well be that there were matters which were canvassed before the matter was formally recorded, which as I
Africa Personnel Services (Pty) Ltd v Shipunda and Others (LCA 38/2011, LC57/2011) [2012] NALC 29 (3
https://www.saflii.org/na/cases/NALC/2012/29.html
for condonation in accordance with the rules of this court supported by an explanation under
Enzo Panelbeaters CC v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (J2414/98, J
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/1999/192.html
the application came to his attention, to instruct attorneys to formally oppose the review
Africa Personnel Services (Pty) Ltd v Shipunda and Others (LCA 38/2011, LC57/2011) [2012] NALC 29 (3
https://www.saflii.org/na/cases/NALC/2012/29.html
for condonation in accordance with the rules of this court supported by an explanation under
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECPEHC/2013/12.html
to the respondent, the applicant knew on 10 May 2011, when he was formally advised by a
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECPEHC/2013/12.html
to the respondent, the applicant knew on 10 May 2011, when he was formally advised by a
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2002/9.html
by the respondent. 10. According to the evidence by Ms Fresen supported by the evidence
General Motors of South Africa v Commission For Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2008/63.html
the CCMA rules.” [17] It is common cause that the applicant did not formally apply for a
Gainsford NO and Others v Jawmend Rossi Capital (Pty) Ltd (27543/2010) [2013] ZAGPJHC 42 (12 Februar
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2013/42.html
the opposed roll. [5] The plaintiffs proposed notice of amendment was not supported by an affidavit. Relying
Gainsford NO and Others v Jawmend Rossi Capital (Pty) Ltd (27543/2010) [2013] ZAGPJHC 42 (12 Februar
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2013/42.html
the opposed roll. [5] The plaintiffs proposed notice of amendment was not supported by an affidavit. Relying
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2025/60.html
of the Act means a development or approved subdivision that has been formally recognised as such in
Capensis Investments 352 (Pty) Ltd and Another v City of Johannesburg and Others (31887/12) [2014] Z
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2014/15.html
main application is opposed by the COJ and Tsepo. Although Engen has formally adopted a neutral
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2000/34.html
Oates (“Oates”), the general manager of the footwear division. 6) Nel (supported by the evidence
Warren v Member of the Executive Council Eastern Cape, Department of Housing Local Governement and T
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECHC/2008/113.html
are received by the Land Use Section within the department, which then formally refers the appeal
Warren v Member of the Executive Council Eastern Cape, Department of Housing Local Governement and T
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECHC/2008/113.html
are received by the Land Use Section within the department, which then formally refers the appeal
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECMHC/2009/29.html
of time and the version of the defendant, which is supported by an occurrence book
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2007/138.html
the relationship broke down. The evidence of Steenkamp and Sibiya supported this conclusion. Both stated
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECMHC/2012/18.html
interests of justice so required.” At the hearing thereof the appellant formally and on
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALAC/2010/27.html
default judgment was granted because it was not notified thereof. It also set out its defence supported by documents as to
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALAC/2010/27.html
default judgment was granted because it was not notified thereof. It also set out its defence supported by documents as to
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/1998/125.html
fell under the jurisdiction of a bargaining council. This claim is supported by a letter
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALAC/2014/110.html
against the respondent and for the appellant to formally apply for the
IDWU obo Linda and Others v Super Group and Others (JA19/2015) [2017] ZALAC 17; (2017) 38 ILJ 1292 (
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALAC/2017/17.html
its very nature as employees of a labour broker, the employees formally agreed to be
Diageo Africa B.V v Newshelf 1167 (Pty) Ltd (107/LM/Dec12) [2013] ZACT 26; [2013] 1 CPLR 184 (CT) (1
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACT/2013/26.html
letter the anonymous party made it clear that it did not wish to formally intervene in the
IDWU obo Linda and Others v Super Group and Others (JA19/2015) [2017] ZALAC 17; (2017) 38 ILJ 1292 (
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALAC/2017/17.html
its very nature as employees of a labour broker, the employees formally agreed to be
Chemical Workers' Industrial Union v Plascon Decorative (Inland) (Pty) Ltd (J2162/98) [1998] ZALAC 2
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALAC/1998/27.html
before the application was due to be heard on Friday 28 August, Plascon formally withdrew disciplinary proceedings against
Diageo Africa B.V v Newshelf 1167 (Pty) Ltd (107/LM/Dec12) [2013] ZACT 26; [2013] 1 CPLR 184 (CT) (1
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACT/2013/26.html
letter the anonymous party made it clear that it did not wish to formally intervene in the
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2022/15.html
since 2001, prior thereto he lived with his mother’s sister, however the deceased supported and provided
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2014/59.html
purchaser and was, therefore, equally invalid. [24] A passage from Wulfsohn [25] supported this approach. The
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2017/76.html
rebuild consumer confidence and trust in the financial system". [21] It supported the work
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2017/76.html
rebuild consumer confidence and trust in the financial system". [21] It supported the work
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2001/135.html
from the fact that the Respondent saw fit, on 27 November 1998, formally to retract
Pistorious N.O. and Others v Competition Commission of South Africa (148/CACNOV16, CR125DEC14, JO102
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACAC/2017/4.html
an "exception" to the complaint referral on six disparate bases. This application was supported by an affidavit, which
N F Die Casting (Pty) Limited v Metal and Engineering Bargaining Council and Others (J611/01) [2002]
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2002/38.html
party’s absence; and (a) ....................... 19.3 The application must be supported by an affidavit. The
National Director of Public Prosecutions v Van derWalt and Another (2241/2006) [2008] ZAECHC 6 (23 J
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECHC/2008/6.html
the applicant's affidavits justify such an order... Where it is clear that facts, though not formally admitted, cannot be denied
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2004/12.html
while the latter is confined to illegal foreigners who have not yet formally entered South Africa but
Pistorious N.O. and Others v Competition Commission of South Africa (148/CACNOV16, CR125DEC14, JO102
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACAC/2017/4.html
an "exception" to the complaint referral on six disparate bases. This application was supported by an affidavit, which
Wilsthire and Others v University of the North (J1814/03) [2005] ZALC 94; [2006] 1 BLLR 82 (LC); (20
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2005/94.html
accept the withdrawal. It was common cause that none of the Applicants formally recorded in writing
Vundisa v Kimberley Correctional Supervision and Parole Board (1969/2022) [2024] ZANCHC 28 (28 March
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZANCHC/2024/28.html
be referred back to the Board. The applicant’s parole was formally withdrawn on 11 October
Democratic Alliance v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (CCT 184/23) [2025] ZACC 8; 2025 (7) BCLR
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2025/8.html
provision. Nonetheless, in the written submissions before this Court the Department supported the approach
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECPEHC/2021/13.html
their interpretation. The case is indeed important given that the SCA has supported its reasoning in
Vundisa v Kimberley Correctional Supervision and Parole Board (1969/2022) [2024] ZANCHC 28 (28 March
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZANCHC/2024/28.html
be referred back to the Board. The applicant’s parole was formally withdrawn on 11 October
McInnes v Technikon Natal (D322/98) [2000] ZALC 152; [2000] 6 BLLR 701 (LC); (2000) 21 ILJ 1138 (LC)
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2000/152.html
time. In a policy document initiated in November 1995 and formally accepted in October
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECPEHC/2021/13.html
their interpretation. The case is indeed important given that the SCA has supported its reasoning in
Lyners v Minister of Education, Province of the Western Cape and Another (C3444/2007) [2007] ZALC 20
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2007/206.html
to the Minister and in which he indicated that he was formally in dispute
Anglo Platinum Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR 129/09) [
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2010/36.html
also informally. The applicant opted to deal with the incidents formally. Evidence before him seemed
https://www.saflii.org/na/cases/NAHC/2000/15.html
only to those persons in the definition clause. This contention is supported by the fact
EOH Abantu (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR 2911/07
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2009/108.html
s submissions that many litigants request a stay of arbitration are not supported by any facts other
Food and Allied Workers Union and Another v The Cold Chain (C324/06) [2007] ZALC 17; [2007] 7 BLLR 6
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2007/17.html
proposing a restructuring of the workplace. On 30 March 2006, Martin was formally advised by the
HOSPERSA and Another v MEC for Health Gauteng Provincial Government (J 542/2008) [2008] ZALC 45; [20
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2008/45.html
affidavit was not accompanied by a condonation application nor did the Respondent formally apply for condonation
Promoting Constitutional Democracy: Regulating Political Parties in the Central African Republic and
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2020/34.html
when the opposition party Mouvement pour l'Evolution Démocratique de l'Afrique Centrale ( MEDAC) was formally prohibited, making the
Weatherly International PLC v Bruni & McLaren and Another ((P) A 191/2006) [2011] NAHC 263 (14 Septe
https://www.saflii.org/na/cases/NAHC/2011/263.html
On 29 th May 2009, the applicant instructed its legal representatives to formally notify the respondents
Southern Sun Hotel Interests (Pty) Ltd v Beverly Hills Rest (Pty) Ltd and Another (CT010NOV2018) [20
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/COMPTRI/2019/65.html
to the first respondent using the prescribed methods, the applicant must formally apply for substituted
Promoting Constitutional Democracy: Regulating Political Parties in the Central African Republic and
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2020/34.html
when the opposition party Mouvement pour l'Evolution Démocratique de l'Afrique Centrale ( MEDAC) was formally prohibited, making the
POPCRU obo Sifuba v Commissioner of the South African Police Services and Others (R 137/2003) [2008]
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2008/162.html
s rules reads as follows: “(1) The following applications must be brought on notice,supported by affidavit: (a
Demographic and Social Factors Influencing Public Opinion on Prostitution: An Exploratory Study in K
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2012/40.html
for the World Cup to have their fun. 26 This move was supported by various high profile
Department of Environmental Affairs, Forestry and Fisheries v B Xulu & Partners Incorporated and Oth
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2021/59.html
a matter on my roll, it behoved him to raise the issue formally, and on
United People's Union of South Africa and Others v Grinaker Duraset (J221/97) [1997] ZALC 11 (1 Dece
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/1997/11.html
sense that it is aimed at ensuring that any agreements that have been reached should be formally recorded and signed
Demographic and Social Factors Influencing Public Opinion on Prostitution: An Exploratory Study in K
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2012/40.html
for the World Cup to have their fun. 26 This move was supported by various high profile
Van Zyl v Minister of Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, Western Cape
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2021/2.html
a servitude over Erf 2228 in favour of Victory Investment which was formally registered against the
Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa v Nefdt and Others (A156/2020) [2021] ZAWCHC 71 (30 March 2021
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2021/71.html
that the proprietors of the Tuck Shop also resided therein, an allegation supported by confirmatory affidavits from
Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa v Nefdt and Others (A156/2020) [2021] ZAWCHC 71 (30 March 2021
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2021/71.html
that the proprietors of the Tuck Shop also resided therein, an allegation supported by confirmatory affidavits from
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2016/87.html
was precluded from doing so on the basis that its plea, even if evidence supported its assertions, would not
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAFSHC/2004/21.html
that of the counsel for the State and I formally confirmed the conviction
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2013/63.html
will only be liable for general damages if the claim is, firstly supported by a serious
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2009/169.html
3. When the proceedings commenced in the High Court, it was formally ordered that the
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2023/436.html
version before this court indicates that the plaintiff cannot recall aspects which would have supported his version. It is
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2016/87.html
was precluded from doing so on the basis that its plea, even if evidence supported its assertions, would not
Moodley v Fidelity Cleaning Services (Pty) Ltd t/a Fidelity Supercare Cleaning (LD1419/01) [2005] ZA
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2005/24.html
Hlanganani. 5.The testimony of both Berger and Stewart was supported by little in
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2013/63.html
will only be liable for general damages if the claim is, firstly supported by a serious
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2009/169.html
3. When the proceedings commenced in the High Court, it was formally ordered that the
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2023/436.html
version before this court indicates that the plaintiff cannot recall aspects which would have supported his version. It is
Maetso v Minister of Police of the Republic of South Africa and Another (3115/2023) [2025] ZANWHC 61
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZANWHC/2025/61.html
in good time and, accordingly, on 15 March 2024 the plaintiff formally called on them to
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZANWHC/2006/65.html
their request and indicated that if they want a postponement they must formally apply for one
COSAWU v Zikhethele Trade (Pty) Ltd and Another (C264/2005) [2005] ZALC 78; (2005) 26 ILJ 1056 (LC);
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALC/2005/78.html
all ties with Mr. Mfundisi and Khulisa Terminal Services”. On 14 March 2005 FPT formally awarded the contract
Massmart Holdings Limited v Shoprite Checkers Proprietary Limited; Massmart Holdings Limited v Shopr
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACT/2017/34.html
opposing party does object, the matter has to be dealt with more formally. [40] In the
F1 Steel CC v Tbhokisi Lelsimibi Steel Boxes and Tanks (Pty) Ltd (2017/40082) [2018] ZAGPJHC 37 (7 M
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2018/37.html
was a Close Corporation until the 15 th March 2017 when it was formally converted to a
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZANWHC/2006/65.html
their request and indicated that if they want a postponement they must formally apply for one
Massmart Holdings Limited v Shoprite Checkers Proprietary Limited; Massmart Holdings Limited v Shopr
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACT/2017/34.html
opposing party does object, the matter has to be dealt with more formally. [40] In the
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAKZDHC/2012/92.html
for a forfeiture of benefits by the Plaintiff. This was formally recorded in the
F1 Steel CC v Tbhokisi Lelsimibi Steel Boxes and Tanks (Pty) Ltd (2017/40082) [2018] ZAGPJHC 37 (7 M
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2018/37.html
was a Close Corporation until the 15 th March 2017 when it was formally converted to a
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECPEHC/2016/22.html
Kleyn of the second respondent was invalid and could not be supported by any law or
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAKZDHC/2012/92.html
for a forfeiture of benefits by the Plaintiff. This was formally recorded in the
Paterson, A ---"Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures, Biodiversity Stewardship and Statu
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2023/16.html
to the country's conservation estate. [16] These are defined as "areas that are not formally protected by the
UMMI Properties (Pty) Ltd v Cowsta Beleggings (Pty) Ltd and Another (1026/09) [2009] ZAECPEHC 18 (28
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECPEHC/2009/18.html
was eventually held on 23 March 2009. [8] At this meeting the First Respondent formally requested the Applicant
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECPEHC/2016/22.html
Kleyn of the second respondent was invalid and could not be supported by any law or
Barratt A --- "In Which the Partners Undertook Reciprocal Duties of Support" - A Discussion of the P
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2022/29.html
to marry and had even discussed having children together. The couple had supported each other – Mr Ruch
Paterson, A ---"Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures, Biodiversity Stewardship and Statu
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2023/16.html
to the country's conservation estate. [16] These are defined as "areas that are not formally protected by the
UMMI Properties (Pty) Ltd v Cowsta Beleggings (Pty) Ltd and Another (1026/09) [2009] ZAECPEHC 18 (28
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECPEHC/2009/18.html
was eventually held on 23 March 2009. [8] At this meeting the First Respondent formally requested the Applicant
Barratt A --- "In Which the Partners Undertook Reciprocal Duties of Support" - A Discussion of the P
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2022/29.html
to marry and had even discussed having children together. The couple had supported each other – Mr Ruch
The Customary Anatomy of the Traditional Governance of the Bafokeng Traditional Community: The Impli
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2017/90.html
mogolwane of a particular family group. However, the mogolwane is not formally appointed or even formally
https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAFSHC/2016/112.html
the main sequestration proceedings and has elected also elected not to formally oppose the IDC
Bezuidenhout, K --- "Climate Change Mitigation at City Level through the Lens of South Africa's Regu
https://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2023/17.html
a legislative framework for environmental sustainability. [97] The NEMA is further supported by subsidiary sector-based